What's Wrong with Early Medieval Medicine?
Что не так со средневековой медициной раннего периода?
2009-11-03
SCID: 54.1/pz96ex6z
Discuss with AI
ancient and medieval medicineearly medieval medicinemedical historiographymedical writingswestern Europe
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
The medical writings of early medieval western Europe c. 700 – c. 1000 have often been derided for their disorganised appearance, poor Latin, nebulous conceptual framework, admixtures of magic and folklore, and general lack of those positive features that historians attribute to ancient or later medieval medicine. This paper attempts to rescue the period from its negative image. It examines a number of superficially bizarre writings so as to place them in an intellectual and sociological context, and to suggest that the presumed contrast between them and their ancient and later medieval counterparts has been wrongly drawn.
Key Findings
1
Apparently bizarre medical texts can be better understood when situated within their intellectual and sociological contexts.
2
Early medieval western European medical writings from c. 700–1000 have been unfairly characterized as disorganized, linguistically deficient, conceptually unclear, and overly magical.
3
The paper argues for reassessing the period’s medical writings rather than judging them primarily by standards derived from other eras.
4
The presumed opposition between early medieval medicine and ancient or later medieval medicine is historically misleading.
Research Object
Medical writings of early medieval western Europe (c. 700–c. 1000)
Research Subject
Their intellectual and sociological context and the validity of the presumed contrast with ancient and later medieval medicine
Publication Details
Publication Date
2009-11-03
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest