Environmental performance of refractories: A state-of-the-art review on current methodological practices and future directions

Экологические показатели огнеупоров: обзор современного состояния методических практик и направлений развития
Angélique Léonard, Sarah Badioli, Md Jubayed, Marielle Dargaud, Rinus Siebring
2025-08-18

carbon footprint (CF)data quality and uncertaintiesimpact assessment methodologylife cycle assessment (LCA)system boundaries definition
The growing emphasis on sustainable industrial practices has intensified the need for environmental assessments of refractory materials, which are integral to high-temperature processes across sectors such as metallurgy, cement, and glass production. This review examines the application of life cycle assessment (LCA) and carbon footprint (CF) to refractories, providing an in-depth analysis of current practices, key challenges, and potential paths for improvement. This review identified the system boundaries definition, the choice of the impact assessment methodology and the data quality as key methodological challenges driving the quality, accuracy, reliability and comparability of LCA studies. Recognising such challenges, this article advocates for standardised guidelines to enhance and homogenise methodological practices, guarantee cross-study comparisons, and efficiently support decision-making for sustainability. Additionally, transitioning from CF to LCA approaches is emphasised to avoid trade-offs across environmental impact categories. Lastly, establishing a collaborative network for data collection and sharing is fundamental to address the data quality criticality and enlarge the system boundaries both upstream and downstream. Finally, this review identified common trends in critical environmental domains and impacting processes. • Life cycle assessment studies of refractories were reviewed. • Energy supply is a hot spot for refractories and raw materials production. • Variations in scope and functional units compromise comparability among LCA studies. • Data quality issues and uncertainties are underreported, reducing transparency. • A harmonized LCA methodological framework is needed to enhance result quality.
1
A harmonized, standardized LCA methodological framework and a collaborative data-sharing network are recommended to improve study consistency and data availability.
2
Data quality issues and underreported uncertainties reduce transparency and reliability of existing LCA studies on refractories.
3
Energy supply during refractory production and raw material extraction is a consistent environmental hot spot.
4
Life cycle assessment (LCA) and carbon footprint (CF) methods are increasingly applied to evaluate environmental performance of refractories across industries.
5
System boundary definition, impact assessment method choice, and data quality are key methodological challenges affecting LCA study accuracy and comparability.
6
The paper advocates transitioning from CF to full LCA to avoid trade-offs across environmental impact categories.
7
Variations in study scope and functional units across LCA studies compromise comparability of results.

Refractory materials used in high-temperature industrial processes

Methodological practices and environmental performance assessment (application of LCA and carbon footprinting), including system boundaries, impact assessment choices, data quality, comparability, and need for harmonized guidelines

Publication Details
Publication Date
2025-08-18
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
5
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Angélique Léonard
Sarah Badioli
Md Jubayed
Marielle Dargaud
Rinus Siebring
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%