A Meta-Analytic Review of Preschool Social and Emotional Learning Interventions

Метааналитический обзор программ социально-эмоционального обучения для детей дошкольного возраста
Dana Murano, Jeremy Sawyer, Anastasiya A. Lipnevich
2020-03-19

SEL interventionsmeta-analysismeta-regressionpreschool social and emotional learningproblem behaviors
This meta-analysis summarized the effects of universal and targeted social and emotional learning (SEL) interventions in 48 studies on the development of social and emotional skills and the reduction of problem behaviors in 15,498 preschool students. For universal SEL interventions delivered to all students, a random-effects model with 33 primary studies showed small to medium effects for the overall development of social and emotional skills (Hedges’s g = .34) and for the reduction of problem behaviors (g = .32), with an overall grand mean of g = .35. For targeted interventions, delivered to at-risk students identified as being in need of additional supports, a random-effects model with 15 primary studies showed medium effects for the overall development of social and emotional skills (Hedges’s g = .44) and for the reduction of problem behaviors (g = .50), with an overall grand mean of g = .48. A meta-regression model showed that intervention program accounted for 83% of heterogeneity in the overall effect size for universal interventions. Overall, this meta-analysis demonstrated that preschool children benefit from SEL interventions in different contexts, particularly those who were identified as being in need of early intervention. Moreover, best practices for preschool SEL interventions may differ from best practices for K–12 students, given the developmental uniqueness of the preschool years.
1
A meta-analysis of 48 studies involving 15,498 preschoolers found that SEL interventions improve social-emotional skills and reduce problem behaviors.
2
Intervention program differences explained 83% of heterogeneity in universal-intervention effect sizes, and preschool SEL practices may need to differ from K–12 approaches.
3
Overall effects were stronger for targeted interventions (grand mean g = .48) than for universal interventions (grand mean g = .35).
4
Targeted SEL interventions for at-risk preschoolers produced medium effects on social-emotional skills (g = .44) and problem behaviors (g = .50).
5
Universal SEL interventions produced small-to-medium effects on social-emotional skills (Hedges’s g = .34) and problem behaviors (g = .32).

Preschool social and emotional learning (SEL) interventions for universal and at-risk preschool students

Effects of SEL interventions on preschool children’s social and emotional skills and problem behaviors

Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-03-19
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Dana Murano
Jeremy Sawyer
Anastasiya A. Lipnevich
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%