Intonation and interpretation: phonetics and phonology

Интонация и интерпретация: фонетика и фонология
Carlos Gussenhoven
2002-04-11

biological codesinformation statusintonational grammarintonational meaningphonetic implementation
Intonational meaning is located in two components of language, the phonetic implementation and the intonational grammar.The phonetic implementation is widely used for the expression of universal meanings that derive from 'biological codes', meaning dimensions based on aspects of the production process of pitch variation.Three codes are identified, Ohala's Frequency Code, the Effort Code and the Production Code.In each case, 'informational' meanings (which relate to the message) are identified, while for the first two codes also 'affective' meanings (relating to the state of the speaker) are discussed.Speech communities will vary in the extent to which they employ those meanings, and in the choices they make when they conflict.What they will never do, however, is change the natural form-function relations that they embody.By contrast, grammaticalised meanings often mimic the natural meanings, but linguistic change may create quite arbitrary form-meaning relations when forms are phonologised, and the semantics is systematised.English grammaticalised intonational meaning concerns information status.
1
Grammaticalized intonational meanings can imitate natural meanings yet develop arbitrary form–meaning mappings; in English, grammaticalized intonation primarily encodes information status.
2
Intonational meaning is divided between phonetic implementation and intonational grammar, which contribute meaning through different mechanisms.
3
Phonetic implementation expresses universal meanings grounded in three biological codes: Ohala’s Frequency Code, the Effort Code, and the Production Code.
4
Speech communities may differ in how extensively they use biological-code meanings and resolve conflicts, but cannot alter the underlying natural form–function relationships.
5
The Frequency and Effort Codes convey both informational meanings related to the message and affective meanings related to the speaker’s state.

intonational meaning in language, including phonetic implementation and intonational grammar

the distinction and relationship between biologically grounded phonetic form–function meanings and grammaticalised intonational meanings, including their informational and affective interpretations

Publication Details
Publication Date
2002-04-11
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Carlos Gussenhoven
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%