Sustainable and resilient reinforced soil structures: insights into interface mechanics

Устойчивые и надежные армированные грунтовые конструкции: особенности механики контакта
G. Cardile
2026-01-19

cyclic loadinggeosynthetic reinforcementisochronous curvespullout testssoil-geosynthetic interface mechanics
Geotechnical engineering is fundamental to sustainable development and the resilience of infrastructure against natural hazards. Sustainability, prioritising ecological protection and societal well-being, is intrinsically linked to resilience, the capacity of structures to withstand and rapidly recover from disruptive events. Achieving resilient geotechnical designs requires a dynamic approach integrating technical robustness with environmental, social, and economic considerations. Geosynthetics have become essential in civil engineering, significantly enhancing structural safety, durability, and serviceability while minimising ecological impact. As reinforcements, geosynthetics enhance structural resilience under cyclic, seismic, and sustained loading conditions. However, fully leveraging these benefits requires a comprehensive understanding of soil-geosynthetic interface mechanics and load transfer mechanisms. Drawing from the keynote lecture at the 12th International Conference on Geosynthetics, this article synthesises over 15 years of experimental research on soil-geosynthetic interfaces under various pullout conditions. Results highlight the critical influence of reinforcement extensibility, confinement, and loading history on interface behaviour. Long-term tests indicate that creep reduction factors derived from in-air tests may be overly conservative. New interface-specific isochronous curves offer more realistic and safer serviceability limit state assessments. Additionally, cyclic pullout tests reveal reduced post-cyclic resistance at lower confinement pressures, an aspect not currently addressed by existing design standards.
1
Cyclic pullout tests show reduced post-cyclic resistance at low confinement pressures, a factor not addressed by current design standards.
2
Geosynthetics improve the safety, durability, serviceability, and resilience of reinforced soil structures while reducing ecological impacts.
3
Interface-specific isochronous curves provide more realistic and safer assessments of serviceability limit states.
4
Long-term testing indicates that creep reduction factors based on in-air tests can be overly conservative for reinforced soil design.
5
Soil–geosynthetic interface behaviour is strongly governed by reinforcement extensibility, confinement, and loading history under pullout conditions.

soil–geosynthetic interfaces in reinforced soil structures

interface mechanics and load-transfer behavior under pullout, cyclic, seismic, and sustained loading, including effects of extensibility, confinement, loading history, creep, and post-cyclic resistance

Publication Details
Publication Date
2026-01-19
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
2
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
G. Cardile
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%