Machine learning approaches for estimating interfacial tension between oil/gas and oil/water systems: a performance analysis

Методы машинного обучения для оценки межфазного натяжения в системах нефть/газ и нефть/вода: анализ производительности
Javad Mahdavi Kalatehno, Fatemeh Yousefmarzi, Ali Haratian, Mostafa Keihani Kamal
2024-01-09

CatboostDecision TreeGradient BoostingR-squaredRandom ForestsSupport Vector Regression (SVR)XGBoostgas formation volume factorgas-oil ratiointerfacial tension (IFT)oil densityoil/gas IFT predictionoil/water IFT prediction
Interfacial tension (IFT) is a key physical property that affects various processes in the oil and gas industry, such as enhanced oil recovery, multiphase flow, and emulsion stability. Accurate prediction of IFT is essential for optimizing these processes and increasing their efficiency. This article compares the performance of six machine learning models, namely Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forests (RF), Decision Tree (DT), Gradient Boosting (GB), Catboosting (CB), and XGBoosting (XGB), in predicting IFT between oil/gas and oil/water systems. The models are trained and tested on a dataset that contains various input parameters that influence IFT, such as gas-oil ratio, gas formation volume factor, oil density, etc. The results show that SVR and Catboost models achieve the highest accuracy for oil/gas IFT prediction, with an R-squared value of 0.99, while SVR outperforms Catboost for Oil/Water IFT prediction, with an R-squared value of 0.99. The study demonstrates the potential of machine learning models as a reliable and resilient tool for predicting IFT in the oil and gas industry. The findings of this study can help improve the understanding and optimization of IFT forecasting and facilitate the development of more efficient reservoir management strategies.
1
For oil/water IFT prediction, SVR outperformed CatBoost, achieving R-squared = 0.99.
2
Models were trained on a dataset including predictors such as gas-oil ratio, gas formation volume factor, and oil density.
3
SVR and CatBoost achieved the highest accuracy for oil/gas IFT prediction, each reaching R-squared = 0.99.
4
Six ML models (SVR, RF, DT, GB, CatBoost, XGBoost) were compared for predicting interfacial tension (IFT) in oil/gas and oil/water systems.
5
The study concludes ML models provide a reliable and resilient approach for IFT prediction, aiding reservoir management and process optimization.

Interfacial tension (IFT) between oil/gas and oil/water systems

Accuracy and comparative performance of six machine learning models (SVR, RF, DT, GB, Catboost, XGBoost) in predicting IFT from input parameters (e.g., gas-oil ratio, gas formation volume factor, oil density)

Publication Details
Publication Date
2024-01-09
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
50
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Javad Mahdavi Kalatehno
Fatemeh Yousefmarzi
Ali Haratian
Mostafa Keihani Kamal
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%