Clinical review: Early patient mobilization in the ICU
Клинический обзор: ранняя мобилизация пациентов в отделении интенсивной терапии
2012-01-01
SCID: 54.1/r76nhjmg
Discuss with AI
critical illness-associated muscle weaknesscycle ergometryearly mobilizationintensive care unitmechanical ventilation
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Early mobilization (EM) of ICU patients is a physiologically logical intervention to attenuate critical illness-associated muscle weakness. However, its long-term value remains controversial. We performed a detailed analytical review of the literature using multiple relevant key terms in order to provide a comprehensive assessment of current knowledge on EM in critically ill patients. We found that the term EM remains undefined and encompasses a range of heterogeneous interventions that have been used alone or in combination. Nonetheless, several studies suggest that different forms of EM may be both safe and feasible in ICU patients, including those receiving mechanical ventilation. Unfortunately, these studies of EM are mostly single center in design, have limited external validity and have highly variable control treatments. In addition, new technology to facilitate EM such as cycle ergometry, transcutaneous electrical muscle stimulation and video therapy are increasingly being used to achieve such EM despite limited evidence of efficacy. We conclude that although preliminary low-level evidence suggests that EM in the ICU is safe, feasible and may yield clinical benefits, EM is also labor-intensive and requires appropriate staffing models and equipment. More research is thus required to identify current standard practice, optimal EM techniques and appropriate outcome measures before EM can be introduced into the routine care of critically ill patients.
Key Findings
1
Available studies suggest early mobilization can be safe and feasible in ICU patients, including those receiving mechanical ventilation.
2
Early mobilization is physiologically rational for reducing critical illness-associated muscle weakness, but its long-term clinical value remains uncertain.
3
Evidence is limited by predominantly single-center studies, restricted external validity, and highly variable control treatments.
4
Technologies such as cycle ergometry, transcutaneous electrical muscle stimulation, and video therapy are increasingly used despite limited efficacy evidence; broader implementation requires staffing and equipment, while optimal techniques and outcomes remain to be established.
5
The term early mobilization lacks a standardized definition and includes heterogeneous interventions delivered individually or in combination.
Research Object
early mobilization of critically ill ICU patients
Research Subject
the safety, feasibility, clinical benefits, optimal techniques, staffing and equipment requirements, and outcome measures of early mobilization
Publication Details
Publication Date
2012-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest