Estimation of terminal ballistics parameters for several 7.62×51 mm projectiles using numerical simulations
Оценка параметров терминальной баллистики для нескольких снарядов 7,62×51 мм с использованием численных симуляций
2024-03-26
SCID: 54.1/re66zuxa
Discuss with AI
7.62×51 mm projectilesAnsys Autodynhard steel target (Armox 500T)penetration depthterminal ballistics
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Six widely used 7.62 ×51 mm projectile types (M80, M61, P80/1, M80A1, M1158, and M993) were subjected to the analysis in this paper. Numerical simulations (Ansys Autodyn) of projectile impacts on hard steel targets were performed as part of this analysis. Projectiles had the same impact velocity (800 m/s). This allowed evaluation of the projectile’s design and material’s effect on its performance against a hard steel target. Validation of the numerical model and used materials was first performed, using available experimental data. A short description and Computer-Aided Design (CAD) model of projectiles is also given. Comparing the M1158 projectile to other AP projectiles taken into consideration, it was concluded that the former had a much deeper penetration depth into a hard steel target (Armox 500T). The projectile’s penetrating capability is greatly impacted by the material selection used for its component parts. Assuming all other factors remain constant, penetrators with higher density and harderness can achieve deeper penetration. Under the same conditions, an increase in penetrator length results in an increase in penetration depth. The absence of a gilding metal jacket in the projectile’s frontal ogive section can decrease energy required to remove the jacket during the penetration, hence increasing the projectile’s penetration capabilities.
Key Findings
1
Longer penetrator length increases penetration depth when other factors are constant.
2
Numerical simulations (Ansys Autodyn) were used to analyze six 7.62×51 mm projectile types impacting hard steel at 800 m/s.
3
Omitting a gilding metal jacket from the frontal ogive reduces energy needed to remove the jacket during penetration, thereby increasing penetration capability.
4
Projectile material selection strongly affects penetration: higher density and hardness of penetrators increase penetration depth.
5
The M1158 projectile achieved much deeper penetration into Armox 500T steel than the other considered AP projectiles.
6
Validation of the numerical model and material data was performed using available experimental data.
Research Object
Seven 7.62×51 mm projectile types (M80, M61, P80/1, M80A1, M1158, and M993) impacting a hard steel target (Armox 500T) in numerical simulations
Research Subject
Terminal ballistics performance metrics—penetration depth and factors affecting penetration (projectile design, component materials/density/hardness, penetrator length, and presence/absence of gilding metal jacket) at 800 m/s impact velocity as estimated by numerical simulations
Publication Details
Publication Date
2024-03-26
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
1
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest