Efficacy and Safety of Chinese Herbal Medicine Compared With Losartan for Mild Essential Hypertension: A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Noninferiority Trial
Эффективность и безопасность китайского растительного препарата по сравнению с лозартаном при лёгкой эссенциальной гипертензии: рандомизированное многоцентровое двойное слепое исследование не меньшей эффективности
2022-02-02
SCID: 54.1/rg8u5anu
Discuss with AI
Chinese herbal medicineSongling Xuemaikang capsulelosartanmild essential hypertensionnoninferiority trial
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Background: Hypertension is one of the most challenging public health problems worldwide. Previous studies suggested that the Songling Xuemaikang capsule (SXC)—a Chinese herbal formula—was effective for essential hypertension. However, the efficacy of SXC monotherapy for hypertension remains unclear. We aimed to compare the blood pressure (BP)–lowering efficacy and safety of SXC versus losartan in patients with essential hypertension. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial in China, patients 18 to 65 years of age with mild essential hypertension were randomly allocated to receive either SXC or losartan for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in sitting diastolic BP from baseline to 8 weeks, with a predefined noninferiority margin of −2.5 mm Hg. Results: Of the 755 patients who entered a 2-week run-in period, 628 patients (327 women and 301 men; mean [SD] age, 52.6 [9.2] years) were randomly assigned to the SXC (n=314) or losartan (n=314) group. The primary analysis based on the intention-to-treat principle showed that the change in diastolic BP from baseline to 8 weeks was similar between the SXC and losartan groups (−7.9 [8.0] versus −8.1 [7.9]). The lower boundary of 95% CI (mean difference, −0.24 [95% CI, −1.51 to 1.03]) was above the margin of −2.5 mm Hg, showing noninferiority. Results were consistent with per-protocol analysis. SXC produced greater improvements in total hypertension symptom score (−5.7 [4.2] versus −5.0 [4.0]; P =0.020) and total cholesterol (−0.1 [1.0] versus 0.1 [1.2]; P =0.025). There were no differences between groups in the other BP and patient-reported outcomes. Incidence and severity of adverse events were similar between groups. Conclusions: SXC was well tolerated and demonstrated noninferior to losartan in BP lowering in patients with mild hypertension. SXC might be an alternative for mild hypertension, particularly for patients with a preference for natural medicine. Registration: URL: www.chictr.org.cn ; Unique identifier: ChiCTR-IPR-16008108.
Key Findings
1
In a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial, Songling Xuemaikang capsule was noninferior to losartan for lowering diastolic blood pressure over 8 weeks.
2
Mean diastolic blood pressure changes were −7.9 mm Hg with SXC and −8.1 mm Hg with losartan; the confidence interval met the prespecified noninferiority margin.
3
SXC improved total hypertension symptom scores and total cholesterol more than losartan, while other blood pressure and patient-reported outcomes did not differ.
4
SXC may be an alternative monotherapy for adults with mild essential hypertension, especially those preferring natural medicine.
5
The incidence and severity of adverse events were similar between SXC and losartan, indicating comparable short-term tolerability.
Research Object
Adults with mild essential hypertension treated with Songling Xuemaikang capsule (SXC) or losartan
Research Subject
Comparative blood-pressure-lowering efficacy, noninferiority, symptom and cholesterol improvements, tolerability, and safety of SXC monotherapy versus losartan
Publication Details
Publication Date
2022-02-02
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
42
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest