Military-civilian partnerships and the clinical readiness mission: A preliminary study from the Military Health System and the American College of Surgeons

Военно-гражданские партнерства и задача обеспечения клинической готовности: предварительное исследование Военной системы здравоохранения и Американского колледжа хирургов
Daniel Grabo, Jennifer M. Gurney, Lowell Parascandola, M. Margaret Knudson
2022-05-18

American College of SurgeonsMilitary Health Systemclinical readinessmilitary-civilian partnershipstrauma surgery
BACKGROUND: The Blue Book , published in conjunction with the Military Health System Strategic Partnership with the American College of Surgeons, serves as a reference manual for institutions wishing to establish a military-civilian partnership (MCP). To evaluate the applicability of the criteria contained in the Blue Book , we created a survey to be distributed to MCP military surgeons and their civilian host champions. METHODS: E-mail surveys were sent to MCP military surgeons and civilian host champions. Military surgeons were queried about basic demographic information and aspects of the MCP including type, duration of assignment, onboarding, malpractice coverage, and billing for services. We gathered information on the role of military surgeons at the MCP, workload information, and trauma cases. The civilian host champions survey focused on institutional activities including trauma surgical volume, clinical and educational opportunities for the military surgeons, and exposure to research. Military-civilian partnership military surgeons and civilian host champions were questioned on program attributes: administrative support, budget, and profile of the program within the institution. RESULTS: Ten MCP military surgeons and 7 host champions completed surveys. The majority of military surgeons were assigned to the MCP for a 3-year instructor role (90%), and most were trauma surgeons (80%). Clinical activities for the military surgeon were where 60% spent ≥13 weeks annually on trauma. Military surgeons identified host program support in academic growth, deployment preparation, and sense of value at the MCP as positive attributes. Civilian host champions unanimously reported that exposure to research, opportunities to lead trauma teams, dedicated intensive care unit time, and patient volume were positive program attributes. CONCLUSION: This preliminary survey demonstrates that the criteria put forth in the Blue Book align with experiences of MCP military surgeons and host champions. Continued development of this survey and others like it may be useful in the MCP program selection and evaluation process. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management; Level V.
1
Civilian host champions unanimously identified research exposure, trauma-team leadership opportunities, dedicated intensive care unit time, and patient volume as positive attributes.
2
Military surgeons valued host-program support for academic development, deployment preparation, and feeling valued within the partnership.
3
Most military surgeons served three-year instructor assignments (90%) and were trauma surgeons (80%).
4
Sixty percent of military surgeons spent at least 13 weeks annually providing trauma care at their civilian host institutions.
5
The preliminary findings indicate that Blue Book criteria align with the reported experiences of military-civilian partnership surgeons.
6
The study evaluated Blue Book criteria using surveys of 10 military surgeons and 7 civilian host champions from military-civilian partnerships.

military-civilian partnerships (MCPs) between the Military Health System and civilian host institutions, involving military surgeons

clinical readiness mission-related program attributes and experiences, including trauma-care workload, educational and research opportunities, deployment preparation, and institutional support

Publication Details
Publication Date
2022-05-18
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
23
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Daniel Grabo
Jennifer M. Gurney
Lowell Parascandola
M. Margaret Knudson
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%