The history and impact of digitization and digital data mobilization on biodiversity research
История и влияние оцифровки и мобилизации цифровых данных на исследования биоразнообразия
2018-11-19
SCID: 54.1/rt8b5wzb
Discuss with AI
Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF)biodiversity data mobilizationdigitization of biodiversity collectionsnatural history museumsspecimen-based research
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
The first two decades of the twenty-first century have seen a rapid rise in the mobilization of digital biodiversity data. This has thrust natural history museums into the forefront of biodiversity research, underscoring their central role in the modern scientific enterprise. The advent of mobilization initiatives such as the United States National Science Foundation's Advancing Digitization of Biodiversity Collections (ADBC), Australia's Atlas of Living Australia (ALA), Mexico's National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity (CONABIO), Brazil's Centro de Referência em Informação (CRIA) and China's National Specimen Information Infrastructure (NSII) has led to a rapid rise in data aggregators and an exponential increase in digital data for scientific research and arguably provide the best evidence of where species live. The international Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) now serves about 131 million museum specimen records, and Integrated Digitized Biocollections (iDigBio) in the USA has amassed more than 115 million. These resources expose collections to a wider audience of researchers, provide the best biodiversity data in the modern era outside of nature itself and ensure the primacy of specimen-based research. Here, we provide a brief history of worldwide data mobilization, their impact on biodiversity research, challenges for ensuring data quality, their contribution to scientific publications and evidence of the rising profiles of natural history collections.This article is part of the theme issue 'Biological collections for understanding biodiversity in the Anthropocene'.
Key Findings
1
GBIF provides approximately 131 million museum specimen records, while iDigBio has accumulated more than 115 million digital records.
2
Key ongoing issues include ensuring data quality, assessing contributions to scientific publications, and demonstrating the growing scientific profile of natural history collections.
3
Major national and international initiatives, including GBIF, ADBC, ALA, CONABIO, CRIA, NSII, and iDigBio, have created large-scale biodiversity data aggregators.
4
Mobilized specimen data provide among the strongest available evidence of species distributions and reinforce the importance of specimen-based research.
5
Natural history museums have become central to modern biodiversity research because digitization exposes specimen collections to broader research communities.
6
Rapid digitization initiatives have dramatically increased the availability and mobilization of digital biodiversity data during the first two decades of the twenty-first century.
Research Object
digital biodiversity data and natural history museum collections
Research Subject
the history, mobilization, research impact, data quality challenges, and contribution to scientific publications of digital biodiversity data
Publication Details
Publication Date
2018-11-19
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest