Posterior Urethral Valve Treatments and Outcomes in Children Receiving Kidney Transplants

Лечение клапанов задней уретры и исходы у детей, перенесших трансплантацию почки
Matthew S. Fine, Kenneth M. Smith, Dhirendra Shrivastava, Marie Cook, Aseem R. Shukla
2011-04-28

bladder dysfunctionkidney graft survivalposterior urethral valvesrenal transplantationvalve ablation
PURPOSE: We evaluated the impact of surgical approaches to posterior urethral valves on renal transplant survival and compared transplant survival in children with vs without posterior urethral valves. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of all children who underwent renal transplantation from January 1984 to March 2008 and performed univariate subgroup analysis in those with posterior urethral valves. We evaluated the ureteroneocystotomy method, immunosuppression and valve treatment. In patients with posterior urethral valves we regarded nocturnal and/or daytime incontinence, severe urgency and the need for intermittent catheterization or double voiding for increased post-void residual urine as signs of bladder dysfunction. RESULTS: The initial renal transplant was received by 418 children at a mean age of 5.6 years. The 59 boys with posterior urethral valves received a total of 69 kidneys. By 8-year followup the kidney had failed in 24 of 59 boys with and 143 of 359 without posterior urethral valves (OR 0.9665, 95% CI 0.5462-1.692, p = 0.9105). Immunosuppression was consistent in the 2 groups. Outcomes were similar across all ureteroneocystotomy techniques. Initial management for posterior urethral valves was valve ablation alone in 12 boys, vesicostomy in 7 and supravesical diversion in 11. There was no difference in transplant survival or bladder dysfunction based on valve intervention. In 18 boys (55%) we noted overlapping signs of bladder dysfunction, of whom 11 performed intermittent catheterization or had increased post-void residual urine, 4 had severe urgency, 4 had daytime incontinence and 7 had nocturnal incontinence. Bladder dysfunction did not predict increased graft loss (OR 3.306, 95% CI 0.7615-16.27, p = 0.1134). CONCLUSIONS: Of children who undergo renal transplantation boys with posterior urethral valves do not have a higher graft failure rate. Treatment for posterior urethral valves did not significantly impact transplant survival or bladder dysfunction.
1
Bladder dysfunction signs occurred in 55% of boys with posterior urethral valves but did not significantly predict graft loss (OR 3.306, p=0.1134).
2
Children with posterior urethral valves did not have higher 8-year kidney graft failure rates than children without valves (24/59 vs 143/359; p=0.9105).
3
Initial valve management—ablation alone, vesicostomy, or supravesical diversion—did not significantly affect transplant survival or bladder dysfunction.
4
Ureteroneocystotomy technique and immunosuppression produced similar transplant outcomes across groups.

Children undergoing renal transplantation, particularly boys with posterior urethral valves

The effects of posterior urethral valve treatment approaches and associated bladder dysfunction on renal allograft survival and graft failure

Publication Details
Publication Date
2011-04-28
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Matthew S. Fine
Kenneth M. Smith
Dhirendra Shrivastava
Marie Cook
Aseem R. Shukla
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%