empiricist structuralismindexicalitymeasurement outcomespicture theory of sciencescientific representation
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Abstract Science represents natural phenomena by means of theories, as well as in many concrete ways by such means as pictures, graphs, table-top models, and computer simulations. This book begins with an inquiry into the nature of representation in general, drawing on such diverse sources as Plato's dialogues, the development of perspectival drawing in the Renaissance, and the geometric styles of modeling in modern physics. Starting with Mach's and Poincaré's analyses of measurement and Reichenbach's ‘problem of coordination’, this book presents a view of measurement outcomes as representations achieved in a process of mutual stabilization of theory and empirical inquiry. With respect to the theories of contemporary science, the book defends an empiricist structuralist version of the ‘picture theory’ of science, compatible with a constructive empiricist view, through an inquiry into the paradoxes that came to light in 20th-century philosophies of science. It is argued that indexicality enters irreducibly into the conditions of use and application of measurement, models, and theories. The book concludes with an analysis of the complex relationship between appearance and reality in the scientific world-picture, arguing against the completeness criterion that demands a derivation of the appearances from the theoretically postulated reality.
Key Findings
1
Indexicality (context-dependent reference) is irreducibly involved in using and applying measurements, models, and theories.
2
Measurement outcomes are representations produced by mutual stabilization between theory and empirical inquiry.
3
Scientific representation includes theories and concrete media (pictures, graphs, models, simulations) as distinct representational means.
4
The book defends an empiricist structuralist 'picture theory' of science compatible with constructive empiricism for contemporary scientific theories.
5
The completeness criterion—deriving appearances from postulated reality—is rejected; appearance and reality have a complex relationship in the scientific worldview.
Research Object
Scientific representation (theories, models, pictures, graphs, table-top models, and computer simulations used to represent natural phenomena)
Research Subject
Nature, role, and epistemic conditions of scientific representation including measurement as mutual stabilization of theory and empirical inquiry, empiricist structuralist picture-theory, indexicality in application of measurement/models/theories, and the appearance–reality relationship
Publication Details
Publication Date
2008-08-07
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest