The logics of war and food (in)security
Логика войны и (не)продовольственная безопасность
2022-04-04
SCID: 54.1/rzy257ep
Discuss with AI
conflict-induced displacementfood controlfood insecurityhunger as a weapon of warwar and violent conflicts
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Many of today's food crises are linked to war and violent conflicts. This paper elaborates four logics of war that have an impact on food insecurity: a) destruction; b) conflict-induced displacement; c) food control; d) hunger as a “weapon of war”. These logics explain why governments or belligerents are often unable or unwilling to respond to food crises, and why humanitarian assistance faces challenges in reaching people in need, while simultaneously avoiding exacerbating conflict. To mitigate future food crises, this article suggests a) to respect food as a human right, b) to overcome the silo-thinking between aid organizations, c) to integrate local capacities, and d) to enhance early action.
Key Findings
1
Humanitarian assistance faces difficulties reaching affected populations while avoiding actions that unintentionally intensify conflict.
2
The paper identifies four war-related mechanisms driving food insecurity: destruction, conflict-induced displacement, food control, and hunger used as a weapon of war.
3
The paper recommends recognizing food as a human right, overcoming organizational silos, integrating local capacities, and strengthening early action to mitigate future food crises.
4
These mechanisms help explain why governments and belligerents may be unable or unwilling to address food crises during conflict.
Research Object
Food crises and food insecurity in contexts of war and violent conflict
Research Subject
Four war logics affecting food insecurity: destruction, conflict-induced displacement, food control, and the use of hunger as a weapon of war
Publication Details
Publication Date
2022-04-04
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
125
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest