Investigation of a Smart Steamflood Pattern to Enhance Production From San Ardo Field, California

Исследование интеллектуальной схемы парового вытеснения для повышения добычи на месторождении Сан-Ардо, Калифорния
D. D. Mamora, Jorge Sandoval
2005-10-09

8-component thermal compositional modelhorizontal producersmart steamflood patternsteam-propane injectionvertical injector
Abstract We have investigated the use of a novel smart steamflood pattern in San Ardo field, California to minimize steam override and thus enhance oil production and reduce steam injection costs. The smart steamflood pattern consists of a vertical injector placed at the center of the pattern and a smart horizontal producer placed on each of two (parallel) sides of the pattern. The horizontal section of the producer is fully open initially, but after steam breakthrough only one-third (heel-end) is kept open. Using an 8-component thermal compositional model, we compared the performance of the smart steamflood pattern (under steam- and steam-propane injection) against the conventional 9-spot inverted pattern in the Lombardi reservoir, San Ardo field. A 16×16×20 Cartesian model was used to represent one-quarter of the typical 10-acre pattern in the field. Main results of our investigation are as follows. First, under steam injection at 1200 BPDCWE, oil recovery after eight years is significantly higher with the smart steamflood pattern (61% OOIP) compared to that with the conventional steamflood pattern (51% OOIP). Second, when steamflooding follows cyclic steam injection, the smart steamflood pattern recovers 53% OOIP in eight years compared to 46% OOIP with the conventional pattern. Lastly, steam-propane injection accelerates the first oil production peak by 10% and the second by 24% when compared with pure steam injection using the smart steamflood pattern.
1
A novel smart steamflood pattern with a central vertical injector and two parallel smart horizontal producers reduces steam override and enhances oil recovery.
2
Simulation used an 8-component thermal compositional model on a 16×16×20 Cartesian grid representing one-quarter of a 10-acre pattern in the Lombardi reservoir, San Ardo field.
3
Under steam injection at 1200 BPDCWE, the smart pattern yields 61% OOIP after eight years versus 51% OOIP for the conventional inverted 9-spot.
4
Using steam-propane injection with the smart pattern accelerates the first oil production peak by 10% and the second peak by 24% relative to pure steam injection.
5
When steamflooding follows cyclic steam injection, the smart pattern recovers 53% OOIP in eight years compared to 46% OOIP for the conventional pattern.

Smart steamflood pattern (vertical central injector with smart horizontal producers) applied in the Lombardi reservoir, San Ardo field

Enhanced oil recovery performance metrics (oil recovery fraction over time, steam override minimization, steam injection cost reduction, and production peak timing) of the smart steamflood pattern under steam and steam–propane injection compared to a conventional 9-spot inverted pattern

Publication Details
Publication Date
2005-10-09
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
D. D. Mamora
Jorge Sandoval
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%