American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the Neuropsychological Assessment of Effort, Response Bias, and Malingering
Заявление консенсусной конференции Американской академии клинической нейропсихологии по нейропсихологической оценке усилий, систематической ошибки ответов и симуляции
2009-09-05
SCID: 54.1/saadjfcq
Discuss with AI
effortmalingeringneuropsychological assessmentresponse biassymptom exaggeration
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
During the past two decades clinical and research efforts have led to increasingly sophisticated and effective methods and instruments designed to detect exaggeration or fabrication of neuropsychological dysfunction, as well as somatic and psychological symptom complaints. A vast literature based on relevant research has emerged and substantial portions of professional meetings attended by clinical neuropsychologists have addressed topics related to malingering (Sweet, King, Malina, Bergman, & Simmons, 2002). Yet, despite these extensive activities, understanding the need for methods of detecting problematic effort and response bias and addressing the presence or absence of malingering has proven challenging for practitioners. A consensus conference, comprised of national and international experts in clinical neuropsychology, was held at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) for the purposes of refinement of critical issues in this area. This consensus statement documents the current state of knowledge and recommendations of expert clinical neuropsychologists and is intended to assist clinicians and researchers with regard to the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering.
Key Findings
1
A substantial research literature and professional discussion have developed around malingering, effort, and response bias assessment.
2
An AACN consensus conference convened national and international clinical neuropsychology experts in 2008 to refine critical issues in this assessment area.
3
Despite methodological advances, practitioners continue to face challenges in recognizing problematic effort and response bias and determining whether malingering is present.
4
Over two decades, clinical and research advances produced increasingly sophisticated methods and instruments for detecting exaggerated or fabricated neuropsychological, somatic, and psychological symptoms.
5
The resulting consensus statement summarizes contemporary knowledge and provides expert recommendations for clinicians and researchers assessing effort, response bias, and malingering.
Research Object
neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering
Research Subject
methods, critical issues, and expert recommendations for detecting problematic effort and response bias and evaluating the presence or absence of malingering
Publication Details
Publication Date
2009-09-05
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest