Arctic marine mammal population status, sea ice habitat loss, and conservation recommendations for the 21st century

Состояние популяций арктических морских млекопитающих, утрата ледового местаобитания и рекомендации по охране в XXI веке
Øystein Wiig, Kristin L. Laidre, Lori Quakenbush, Erik W. Born, Eric V. Regehr, Fernando Ugarte, Harry L. Stern, Dag Vongraven, Kit M. Kovacs, Lloyd F. Lowry, Steven H. Ferguson, Sue E. Moore, Peter L. Boveng, Robyn P. Angliss, Д. И. Литовка, Christian Lydersen
2015-03-17

Arctic marine mammalsfall sea ice advancesea ice habitat losssea ice phenologyspring sea ice retreat
Arctic marine mammals (AMMs) are icons of climate change, largely because of their close association with sea ice. However, neither a circumpolar assessment of AMM status nor a standardized metric of sea ice habitat change is available. We summarized available data on abundance and trend for each AMM species and recognized subpopulation. We also examined species diversity, the extent of human use, and temporal trends in sea ice habitat for 12 regions of the Arctic by calculating the dates of spring sea ice retreat and fall sea ice advance from satellite data (1979-2013). Estimates of AMM abundance varied greatly in quality, and few studies were long enough for trend analysis. Of the AMM subpopulations, 78% (61 of 78) are legally harvested for subsistence purposes. Changes in sea ice phenology have been profound. In all regions except the Bering Sea, the duration of the summer (i.e., reduced ice) period increased by 5-10 weeks and by >20 weeks in the Barents Sea between 1979 and 2013. In light of generally poor data, the importance of human use, and forecasted environmental changes in the 21st century, we recommend the following for effective AMM conservation: maintain and improve comanagement by local, federal, and international partners; recognize spatial and temporal variability in AMM subpopulation response to climate change; implement monitoring programs with clear goals; mitigate cumulative impacts of increased human activity; and recognize the limits of current protected species legislation.
1
A large majority (78%, 61 of 78) of AMM subpopulations are legally harvested for subsistence purposes.
2
AMM abundance estimates vary greatly in quality and few studies are long enough to support robust trend analysis.
3
Conservation recommendations include improved co-management, recognition of spatial/temporal variability in subpopulation responses, goal-driven monitoring, mitigation of cumulative human impacts, and acknowledgement of limits of current protected-species legislation.
4
No circumpolar assessment of Arctic marine mammal (AMM) status or standardized metric of sea ice habitat change existed prior to this study, so authors compiled abundance and trend data for each AMM species and subpopulation.
5
Sea ice phenology changed markedly from 1979–2013: summer (reduced ice) duration increased by 5–10 weeks in all regions except the Bering Sea, and by more than 20 weeks in the Barents Sea.

Arctic marine mammals (AMMs) and their subpopulations across the circumpolar Arctic

Population status, abundance and trends, sea-ice habitat change (phenology: spring retreat and fall advance), human use (harvest/subsistence), and conservation recommendations for AMMs in the 21st century

Publication Details
Publication Date
2015-03-17
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Øystein Wiig
Kristin L. Laidre
Lori Quakenbush
Erik W. Born
Eric V. Regehr
Fernando Ugarte
Harry L. Stern
Dag Vongraven
Kit M. Kovacs
Lloyd F. Lowry
Steven H. Ferguson
Sue E. Moore
Peter L. Boveng
Robyn P. Angliss
Д. И. Литовка
Christian Lydersen
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%