Structural Characteristics and Genesic Mechanism of Antiformal Negative Flower Structures: Insights from the Doseo Basin, Central-West African Rift System

Структурные характеристики и генетический механизм антиформных отрицательных цветочных структур: данные из бассейна Дозео, Центрально-Западная рифтовая система Африки
Xinshun Zhang, Yu Chul Yang, Yifan Song, Kunye Xiao, Yebo Du, Li Pen Wang, Yafei Ou, Ying Hu
2026-03-14

Doseo Basinantiformal negative flower structurecompressional archingpreservation of pre-existing normal faultsstrike-slip tectonic inversion
Unlike classical positive and negative flower structures, antiformal negative flower structures represent a unique structural type developed under strike-slip tectonic inversion regimes. Rarely reported in previous studies, the genesic mechanism of such structures remains poorly understood, particularly the mechanical reasons that inhibit the inversion of pre-existing normal faults under compressional conditions. Based on detailed interpretation of high-resolution seismic data, this study systematically investigates the tectonic setting, structural characteristics, and formation mechanism of antiformal negative flower structures in the Doseo Basin of the Central–West African Rift System, and discusses their implications for the structural evolution of strike-slip inversion basins and the development of hydrocarbon traps.The Doseo Basin is located within the basin-controlling domain of the Central-West African Rift System and experienced two major tectonic episodes: transtension during the Early Cretaceous and intense tectonic inversion during the Eocene. These tectonic events resulted in the development of multiple types of inversion-related structures, including fault-associated, thrust-related, fold-dominated, and antiformal negative flower structures. Antiformal negative flower structures are mainly developed within the central low-relief uplift belt of the basin. In planar view, these structures are arranged in en echelon with a NWW-SEE trend, whereas in cross-section they are characterized by an antiformal uplift controlled by a set of normal faults. During the inversion stage, the pre-existing normal faults were not reactivated to reverse faults; instead, the strata experienced pronounced compressional arching. Notably, the spatial extent of the anticlinal uplift closely coincides with the distribution of the normal faults. Genetic analysis indicates that under the Early Cretaceous transtensional stress field, basement weak zones were reactivated, leading to the formation of normal faults and the initial development of negative flower structures. During this stage, the scale, vertical extent, and activity intensity of the normal faults were established. During the Eocene tectonic inversion, regional transpressional stress was superimposed on the negative flower structure system. However, constrained by two key factors, the relatively high mechanical stability of the early transtensional structures (related to fault cementation and lithological properties of surrounding rocks) and high dipping of the normal faults, the inversion-stage stress failed to reach the critical threshold required for fault polarity reversal. Instead, it was only sufficient to induce compressional arching of the strata, ultimately resulting in antiformal negative flower structures characterized by the preservation of pre-existing normal faults combined with an antiformal uplift.This study demonstrates that the preservation of normal faults is jointly controlled by insufficient inversion-stage stress and the mechanical stability of pre-existing transtensional fault systems. These findings expand current genetic models of structural styles in strike-slip inversion basins and provide new geological constraints for structural interpretation and hydrocarbon trap prediction in the Doseo Basin and other analogous basins.
1
Antiformal negative flower structures are a distinct structural type formed under strike-slip tectonic inversion, different from classical positive and negative flower structures.
2
During Eocene inversion, pre-existing normal faults were not reactivated as reverse faults; instead strata underwent compressional arching while normal faults were preserved.
3
Genetic model: Early Cretaceous transtension reactivated basement weak zones forming normal faults and negative flower structures; later transpressional stress induced antiformal uplift without fault polarity reversal.
4
In the Doseo Basin they occur mainly within a central low-relief uplift belt, arranged en echelon with a NWW-SEE trend in plan and as antiformal uplifts controlled by normal faults in cross-section.
5
Preservation of normal faults resulted from two factors: high mechanical stability of early transtensional structures (fault cementation and surrounding rock lithology) and the high dip of the normal faults preventing polarity reversal.
6
These findings extend genetic models for strike-slip inversion basins and provide geological constraints for structural interpretation and hydrocarbon trap prediction in the Doseo Basin and analogous basins.

Antiformal negative flower structures in the Doseo Basin (Central–West African Rift System)

Their structural characteristics, tectonic setting and genesic (formation) mechanism—specifically the preservation of pre-existing normal faults, compressional arching during Eocene transpressional inversion, and mechanical controls (fault cementation, lithology, fault dip, and inversion-stage stress) leading to antiformal uplift and non-reactivation of normal faults

Publication Details
Publication Date
2026-03-14
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
0
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Xinshun Zhang
Yu Chul Yang
Yifan Song
Kunye Xiao
Yebo Du
Li Pen Wang
Yafei Ou
Ying Hu
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%