Comparative Analysis of Pyrosequencing and a Phylogenetic Microarray for Exploring Microbial Community Structures in the Human Distal Intestine

Сравнительный анализ пиросеквенирования и филогенетического микрочипа для изучения структуры микробных сообществ в дистальном отделе кишечника человека
Marcus J. Claesson, Órla O’Sullivan, Qiong Wang, Janne Nikkilä, Julian R. Marchesi, Hauke Smidt, Willem M. de Vos, R. Paul Ross, Paul W. O’Toole
2009-08-19

16S rRNA gene sequencingHuman Intestinal Tract ChipRDP classifierphylogenetic microarraypyrosequencing
BACKGROUND: Variations in the composition of the human intestinal microbiota are linked to diverse health conditions. High-throughput molecular technologies have recently elucidated microbial community structure at much higher resolution than was previously possible. Here we compare two such methods, pyrosequencing and a phylogenetic array, and evaluate classifications based on two variable 16S rRNA gene regions. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Over 1.75 million amplicon sequences were generated from the V4 and V6 regions of 16S rRNA genes in bacterial DNA extracted from four fecal samples of elderly individuals. The phylotype richness, for individual samples, was 1,400-1,800 for V4 reads and 12,500 for V6 reads, and 5,200 unique phylotypes when combining V4 reads from all samples. The RDP-classifier was more efficient for the V4 than for the far less conserved and shorter V6 region, but differences in community structure also affected efficiency. Even when analyzing only 20% of the reads, the majority of the microbial diversity was captured in two samples tested. DNA from the four samples was hybridized against the Human Intestinal Tract (HIT) Chip, a phylogenetic microarray for community profiling. Comparison of clustering of genus counts from pyrosequencing and HITChip data revealed highly similar profiles. Furthermore, correlations of sequence abundance and hybridization signal intensities were very high for lower-order ranks, but lower at family-level, which was probably due to ambiguous taxonomic groupings. CONCLUSIONS: The RDP-classifier consistently assigned most V4 sequences from human intestinal samples down to genus-level with good accuracy and speed. This is the deepest sequencing of single gastrointestinal samples reported to date, but microbial richness levels have still not leveled out. A majority of these diversities can also be captured with five times lower sampling-depth. HITChip hybridizations and resulting community profiles correlate well with pyrosequencing-based compositions, especially for lower-order ranks, indicating high robustness of both approaches. However, incompatible grouping schemes make exact comparison difficult.
1
Correlations were weaker at the family level, likely because of ambiguous taxonomic groupings.
2
Over 1.75 million 16S rRNA amplicon sequences revealed 1,400–1,800 V4 phylotypes per sample and 12,500 V6 phylotypes per sample.
3
Pyrosequencing and HITChip profiling produced highly similar genus-level community structures, with very high abundance–signal correlations at lower taxonomic ranks.
4
Sampling only 20% of reads captured most microbial diversity in two tested fecal samples, although richness had not reached saturation.
5
The RDP classifier assigned V4 sequences to genus level more efficiently and accurately than sequences from the shorter, less-conserved V6 region.

Microbial communities in the human distal intestine, represented by fecal samples from elderly individuals

The comparative characterization of microbial community structure, diversity, taxonomic composition, and profiling concordance using pyrosequencing and the HITChip phylogenetic microarray across 16S rRNA V4 and V6 regions

Publication Details
Publication Date
2009-08-19
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Marcus J. Claesson
Órla O’Sullivan
Qiong Wang
Janne Nikkilä
Julian R. Marchesi
Hauke Smidt
Willem M. de Vos
R. Paul Ross
Paul W. O’Toole
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%