The ecological effects of providing resource subsidies to predators

Экологические последствия предоставления хищникам ресурсных субсидий
Thomas M. Newsome, Justin A. Dellinger, Chris R. Pavey, William J. Ripple, Carolyn R. Shores, Aaron J. Wirsing, Chris R. Dickman
2014-10-03

human-provided foodshuman–wildlife conflictsresource subsidiesterrestrial mammalian predatorstrophic cascades
Abstract Aim Predators often have important roles in structuring ecosystems via their effects on each other and on prey populations. However, these effects may be altered in the presence of anthropogenic food resources, fuelling debate about whether the availability of such resources could alter the ecological role of predators. Here, we review the extent to which human‐provided foods are utilised by terrestrial mammalian predators (> 1 kg) across the globe. We also assess whether these resources have a direct impact on the ecology and behaviour of predators and an indirect impact on other co‐occurring species. Location Global. Methods Data were derived from searches of the published literature. To summarise the data we grouped studies based on the direct and indirect effects of resource subsidies on predators and co‐occurring species. We then compared the types of predators accessing these resources by grouping species taxonomically and into the following categories: (1) domesticated species, (2) mesopredators and (3) top predators. Results Human‐provided foods were reported to be utilised by 36 terrestrial predator species in 34 different countries. In the presence of these resources we found that: (1) predator abundance increased, (2) the dietary preferences of predators altered to include the food subsidy, (3) life‐history parameters such as survival, reproduction and sociality shifted to the benefit or detriment of the predator, and (4) predators changed their home ranges, activity and movements. In some instances, these modifications indirectly affected co‐occurring species via increased predation or competition. Main conclusions The availability of human‐provided food to predators often results in behavioural or population‐induced changes to predators and trophic cascades. We conclude that there is an urgent need to reduce the access of predators to food subsidies to minimise human–wildlife conflicts and to preserve the integrity of ecosystem functioning in human‐influenced landscapes world‐wide.
1
A global literature review found that 36 terrestrial mammalian predator species across 34 countries utilize human-provided food resources.
2
Human-provided foods changed predator survival, reproduction, sociality, home ranges, activity patterns, and movements, with variable consequences.
3
Predator responses indirectly affected co-occurring species through increased predation or competition, generating trophic cascades.
4
Resource subsidies increased predator abundance and altered dietary preferences by incorporating human-provided foods.
5
The review concludes that restricting predators’ access to human food is urgently needed to reduce human–wildlife conflict and protect ecosystem functioning.

Terrestrial mammalian predators (>1 kg) receiving human-provided food resources

The direct ecological and behavioural effects of human-provided food subsidies on predators and their indirect effects on co-occurring species, including changes in abundance, diet, life history, movement, predation and competition

Publication Details
Publication Date
2014-10-03
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Thomas M. Newsome
Justin A. Dellinger
Chris R. Pavey
William J. Ripple
Carolyn R. Shores
Aaron J. Wirsing
Chris R. Dickman
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%