What Have We Learned about the Resource Curse?

Чему мы научились, изучая ресурсное проклятие?
Michael L. Ross
2014-12-22

authoritarian regime durabilitycorruptionpetroleum wealthpolitical resource curseviolent conflict
Since 2001, hundreds of academic studies have examined the “political resource curse,” meaning the claim that natural resource wealth tends to adversely affect a country's governance. There is now robust evidence that one type of mineral wealth, petroleum, has at least three harmful effects: It tends to make authoritarian regimes more durable, to increase certain types of corruption, and to help trigger violent conflict in low- and middle-income countries. Scholars have also made progress toward understanding the mechanisms that lead to these outcomes and the conditions that make them more likely. This essay reviews the evidence behind these claims, the debates over their validity, and some of the unresolved puzzles for future research.
1
Research has advanced in identifying mechanisms and conditions that make these adverse outcomes more likely, although important puzzles remain unresolved.
2
Robust evidence indicates that petroleum wealth makes authoritarian regimes more durable, increases certain forms of corruption, and helps trigger violent conflict.
3
Since 2001, hundreds of studies have examined whether natural-resource wealth adversely affects national governance.
4
The harmful effects of petroleum are documented primarily in low- and middle-income countries.

Petroleum wealth in low- and middle-income countries

The effects and causal mechanisms of petroleum wealth on authoritarian regime durability, corruption, and violent conflict

Publication Details
Publication Date
2014-12-22
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Michael L. Ross
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%