Practice parameter: Evaluation of the child with global developmental delay [RETIRED]

Практический параметр: обследование ребёнка с общей задержкой развития [ОТОЗВАНО]
Michael Shevell, Stephen Ashwal, Dorothy E. Donley, Jonathan Flint, Monique Gingold, Deborah Hirtz, Annette Majnemer, Michael J. Noetzel, Raj D. Sheth
2003-02-11

Rett syndromecytogenetic studiesfragile X mutationglobal developmental delayneuroimaging
OBJECTIVE: To make evidence-based recommendations concerning the evaluation of the child with a nonprogressive global developmental delay. METHODS: Relevant literature was reviewed, abstracted, and classified. Recommendations were based on a four-tiered scheme of evidence classification. RESULTS: Global developmental delay is common and affects 1% to 3% of children. Given yields of about 1%, routine metabolic screening is not indicated in the initial evaluation of a child with global developmental delay. Because of the higher yield (3.5% to 10%), even in the absence of dysmorphic features or features suggestive of a specific syndrome, routine cytogenetic studies and molecular testing for the fragile X mutation are recommended. The diagnosis of Rett syndrome should be considered in girls with unexplained moderate to severe developmental delay. Additional genetic studies (e.g., subtelomeric chromosomal rearrangements) may also be considered in selected children. Evaluation of serum lead levels should be restricted to those children with identifiable risk factors for excessive lead exposure. Thyroid studies need not be undertaken (unless clinically indicated) if the child underwent newborn screening. An EEG is not recommended as part of the initial evaluation unless there are historical features suggestive of epilepsy or a specific epileptic syndrome. Routine neuroimaging, with MRI preferred to CT, is recommended particularly if abnormalities are found on physical examination. Because of the increased incidence of visual and auditory impairments, children with global developmental delay may undergo appropriate visual and audiometric assessment at the time of diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: A specific etiology can be determined in the majority of children with global developmental delay. Certain routine screening tests are indicated and depending on history and examination findings, additional specific testing may be performed.
1
Global developmental delay affects approximately 1%–3% of children, and a specific etiology can be identified in most cases.
2
Neuroimaging, preferably MRI, is particularly recommended when physical examination abnormalities are present, while EEG, lead testing, and thyroid studies should be targeted to specific indications.
3
Rett syndrome should be considered in girls with unexplained moderate-to-severe developmental delay; additional genetic testing may be selected based on clinical findings.
4
Routine cytogenetic studies and fragile X molecular testing are recommended, with reported yields of 3.5%–10% even without dysmorphic or syndrome-specific features.
5
Routine metabolic screening is not recommended initially because its diagnostic yield is only about 1%.
6
Visual and audiometric assessments are appropriate at diagnosis because children with global developmental delay have increased rates of sensory impairments.

children with nonprogressive global developmental delay

evidence-based diagnostic evaluation, including the indications and yields of genetic, metabolic, neurologic, sensory, and neuroimaging tests

Publication Details
Publication Date
2003-02-11
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Michael Shevell
Stephen Ashwal
Dorothy E. Donley
Jonathan Flint
Monique Gingold
Deborah Hirtz
Annette Majnemer
Michael J. Noetzel
Raj D. Sheth
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%