Hyperspectral Unmixing Overview: Geometrical, Statistical, and Sparse Regression-Based Approaches
Обзор гиперспектрального размешения: геометрические, статистические и методы на основе разреженной регрессии
2012-04-01
SCID: 54.1/szyk7frx
Discuss with AI
abundance estimationendmember extractiongeometrical and statistical methodshyperspectral unmixingsparse regression
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Imaging spectrometers measure electromagnetic energy scattered in their instantaneous field view in hundreds or thousands of spectral channels with higher spectral resolution than multispectral cameras. Imaging spectrometers are therefore often referred to as hyperspectral cameras (HSCs). Higher spectral resolution enables material identification via spectroscopic analysis, which facilitates countless applications that require identifying materials in scenarios unsuitable for classical spectroscopic analysis. Due to low spatial resolution of HSCs, microscopic material mixing, and multiple scattering, spectra measured by HSCs are mixtures of spectra of materials in a scene. Thus, accurate estimation requires unmixing. Pixels are assumed to be mixtures of a few materials, called endmembers. Unmixing involves estimating all or some of: the number of endmembers, their spectral signatures, and their abundances at each pixel. Unmixing is a challenging, ill-posed inverse problem because of model inaccuracies, observation noise, environmental conditions, endmember variability, and data set size. Researchers have devised and investigated many models searching for robust, stable, tractable, and accurate unmixing algorithms. This paper presents an overview of unmixing methods from the time of Keshava and Mustard's unmixing tutorial to the present. Mixing models are first discussed. Signal-subspace, geometrical, statistical, sparsity-based, and spatial-contextual unmixing algorithms are described. Mathematical problems and potential solutions are described. Algorithm characteristics are illustrated experimentally.
Key Findings
1
A wide range of unmixing approaches exist—signal-subspace, geometrical, statistical, sparsity-based, and spatial-contextual methods—each addressing different aspects of robustness, stability, tractability, and accuracy.
2
Hyperspectral cameras produce pixel spectra that are mixtures of multiple material spectra due to low spatial resolution, microscopic mixing, and multiple scattering.
3
The paper reviews mixing models, describes mathematical problems and potential solutions, and experimentally illustrates algorithm characteristics to compare methods since Keshava and Mustard's tutorial.
4
Unmixing aims to estimate number of endmembers, their spectral signatures, and per-pixel abundances, but is an ill-posed inverse problem affected by model inaccuracies, noise, environmental conditions, endmember variability, and dataset size.
Research Object
Hyperspectral imaging data (pixels measured by hyperspectral cameras) comprising mixed spectral signatures of scene materials
Research Subject
Spectral unmixing: estimation of number of endmembers, their spectral signatures, and per-pixel abundances using geometrical, statistical, and sparse regression-based approaches under model inaccuracies, noise, variability, and scalability constraints
Publication Details
Publication Date
2012-04-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest