Biological Integrity: A Long‐Neglected Aspect of Water Resource Management

Биологическая целостность: давно игнорируемый аспект управления водными ресурсами
James R. Karr
1991-02-01

Index of Biotic Integrityambient biological monitoringbiological integrityfish community attributesrunning waters
Water of sufficient quality and quantity is critical to all life. Increasing human population and growth of technology require human society to devote more and more attention to protection of adequate supplies of water. Although perception of biological degradation stimulated current state and federal legislation on the quality of water resources, that biological focus was lost in the search for easily measured physical and chemical surrogates. The "fishable and swimmable" goal of the Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (PL 92-500) and its charge to "restore and maintain" biotic integrity illustrate that law's biological underpinning. Further, the need for operational definitions of terms like "biological integrity" and "unreasonable degradation" and for ecologically sound tools to measure divergence from societal goals have increased interest in biological monitoring. Assessment of water resource quality by sampling biological communities in the field (ambient biological monitoring) is a promising approach that requires expanded use of ecological expertise. One such approach, the Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI), provides a broadly based, multiparameter tool for the assessment of biotic integrity in running waters. IBI based on fish community attributes has now been applied widely in North America. The success of IBI has stimulated the development of similar approaches using other aquatic taxa. Expanded use of ecological expertise in ambient biological monitoring is essential to the protection of water resources. Ecologists have the expertise to contribute significantly to those programs.
1
Ambient biological monitoring, based on field sampling of biological communities, is presented as a promising approach for assessing water-resource quality.
2
Biological integrity was a foundational goal of water-quality legislation but became neglected as monitoring emphasized easily measured physical and chemical surrogates.
3
Effective water-resource assessment requires operational definitions of biological integrity and unreasonable degradation, along with ecologically sound measures of divergence from societal goals.
4
The Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) provides a multiparameter tool for evaluating biotic integrity in running waters using fish-community attributes.
5
Widespread North American application of fish-based IBI has stimulated comparable biological assessment methods for other aquatic taxa, highlighting the essential role of ecological expertise.

water resources and their aquatic biological communities, particularly fish communities in running waters

biological integrity assessment and biological degradation monitoring using ambient biological monitoring and the Index of Biotic Integrity

Publication Details
Publication Date
1991-02-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
James R. Karr
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%