Spatial Cognition and the Semantics of Prepositions in English, Polish and Russian
Пространственное познание и семантика предлогов в английском, польском и русском языках
1989-01-01
SCID: 54.1/t3ar2cwd
Discuss with AI
English-Polish-Russian comparisoncognitive semanticspreposition semanticsspatial cognitiontranslation equivalents
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
-Sose say that knowledge it toaething tb it you never hive.Some say that knowledge it somethin( sitting in your lap. 1 a u t t admit.Just when I think Г а king.Just vhen I think everything's toin great.... 1 just begin.*-Kate Bush.-Sat in Your Lap* This work represents a somewhat revised version of the doctoral dissertation I completed in the Department of Slavic Languages at Brown University in May.1988.I chose the topic for my dissertation at a point ▼hen I had studied both Russian and Polish for a number of years.In many cases, as students of Slavic languages know,knowledge of one Slavic language can be very helpful in learning a second one.Other times, however, the apparently arbitrary differences in the usage of constructions that seem so similar in the two languages can be very frustrating.A case in point is the use of cognate prepositions in the different Slavic languages.I decided to study the seman- tics of certain prepositions to see if there is any way to discern whether the differences are principled in any way, or w hether they are in fact arbitrary.If the cognate prepositions do still have the same meanings, why do such differences in usage arise in lhe different Slavic languages?This led me to also study the use of prepositions in English which serve as translation equivalents of those in Slavic, and to question how we select one preposition over another in a given context: T hen does one say a duck is i a or од the water?After reaiizing that the physical situation in the real world alone does not provide the answer to this question.I was relieved to come across the cognitive approach to semantics in the book $ e a * ú ű c s * a d C o g n itìo o (Jackendoff: 1983).This changed the theoretical approach of my dissertation.The exposition of my analysis was also influenced to a large degree by Herskovits (1982Herskovits ( .1986)).With the current blossoming of cognitive semantics, it seems new works on the topic are appearing at an overwhelming pace.Some that
Key Findings
1
It investigates whether differences between cognate prepositions in Polish and Russian are principled rather than arbitrary.
2
The analysis examines how English prepositions function as translation equivalents of Slavic prepositions and why alternative English forms are selected in particular contexts.
3
The research was developed as a revised doctoral dissertation and was influenced substantially by Jackendoff’s and Herskovits’s approaches to cognitive semantics.
4
The study analyzes the semantics and usage of selected prepositions in English, Polish, and Russian through a comparative cognitive-semantic approach.
5
The work argues that real-world physical configuration alone does not determine preposition choice, motivating an analysis based on cognitive representations of spatial situations.
Research Object
English, Polish, and Russian prepositions and their spatial usage
Research Subject
The semantic and cognitive principles governing the choice and differing usage of cognate and translationally equivalent prepositions across contexts
Publication Details
Publication Date
1989-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest