Efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy versus adalimumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (MONARCH): a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group phase III trial
Эффективность и безопасность монотерапии сарилумабом по сравнению с монотерапией адалимумабом при лечении пациентов с активным ревматоидным артритом (MONARCH): рандомизированное двойное слепое исследование III фазы в параллельных группах
2016-11-18
SCID: 54.1/t5x4g8gf
Discuss with AI
Adalimumab monotherapyDAS28-ESRMONARCH trialRheumatoid arthritisSarilumab monotherapy
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
OBJECTIVES: To compare efficacy and safety of sarilumab monotherapy with adalimumab monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who should not continue treatment with methotrexate (MTX) due to intolerance or inadequate response. METHODS: MONARCH was a randomised, active-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, phase III superiority trial. Patients received sarilumab (200 mg every 2 weeks (q2w)) or adalimumab (40 mg q2w) monotherapy for 24 weeks. The primary end point was change from baseline in 28-joint disease activity score using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) at week 24. RESULTS: Sarilumab was superior to adalimumab in the primary end point of change from baseline in DAS28-ESR (-3.28 vs -2.20; p<0.0001). Sarilumab-treated patients achieved significantly higher American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 response rates (sarilumab: 71.7%/45.7%/23.4%; adalimumab: 58.4%/29.7%/11.9%; all p≤0.0074) and had significantly greater improvement in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (p=0.0037). Importantly, at week 24, more patients receiving sarilumab compared with adalimumab achieved Clinical Disease Activity Index remission (7.1% vs 2.7%; nominal p=0.0468) and low disease activity (41.8% vs 24.9%; nominal p=0.0005, supplemental analysis). Adverse events occurred in 63.6% (adalimumab) and 64.1% (sarilumab) of patients, the most common being neutropenia and injection site reactions (sarilumab) and headache and worsening RA (adalimumab). Incidences of infections (sarilumab: 28.8%; adalimumab: 27.7%) and serious infections (1.1%, both groups) were similar, despite neutropenia differences. CONCLUSIONS: Sarilumab monotherapy demonstrated superiority to adalimumab monotherapy by improving the signs and symptoms and physical functions in patients with RA who were unable to continue MTX treatment. The safety profiles of both therapies were consistent with anticipated class effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02332590.
Key Findings
1
In the 24-week MONARCH phase III trial, sarilumab monotherapy significantly improved DAS28-ESR more than adalimumab monotherapy (-3.28 versus -2.20; p<0.0001).
2
Overall adverse-event rates were similar between sarilumab and adalimumab, while infection and serious-infection incidences were comparable despite differing neutropenia rates.
3
Sarilumab monotherapy was superior for signs, symptoms, and physical function in methotrexate-intolerant or inadequate-response rheumatoid arthritis patients, with safety profiles consistent with expected class effects.
4
Sarilumab produced higher ACR20/50/70 response rates than adalimumab: 71.7%/45.7%/23.4% versus 58.4%/29.7%/11.9%, respectively.
5
Sarilumab yielded significantly greater improvement in physical function and more patients achieved Clinical Disease Activity Index remission or low disease activity.
Research Object
Patients with active rheumatoid arthritis unable to continue methotrexate treatment
Research Subject
Comparative efficacy and safety of sarilumab versus adalimumab monotherapy, including disease activity, clinical responses, physical function, and adverse events over 24 weeks
Publication Details
Publication Date
2016-11-18
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest