Current Issues in Measurement and Reporting of Urinary Albumin Excretion

Современные проблемы измерения и представления результатов определения экскреции альбумина с мочой
Kristin M. Aakre, W. Greg Miller, David E. Bruns, Glen L. Hortin, Sverre Sandberg, Matthew McQueen, Yoshihisa Itoh, John C. Lieske, David Seccombe, Graham Jones, David M. Bunk, Gary C. Curhan, Andrew S. Narva, on behalf of the National Kidney Disease Education Program-IFCC Working Group on Standardization of Albumin in Urine
2008-11-21

albumin/creatinine ratiomeasurement standardizationreference intervalsurinary albumin excretionurine albumin measurement
BACKGROUND: Urinary excretion of albumin indicates kidney damage and is recognized as a risk factor for progression of kidney disease and cardiovascular disease. The role of urinary albumin measurements has focused attention on the clinical need for accurate and clearly reported results. The National Kidney Disease Education Program and the IFCC convened a conference to assess the current state of preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical issues affecting urine albumin measurements and to identify areas needing improvement. CONTENT: The chemistry of albumin in urine is incompletely understood. Current guidelines recommend the use of the albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) as a surrogate for the error-prone collection of timed urine samples. Although ACR results are affected by patient preparation and time of day of sample collection, neither is standardized. Considerable intermethod differences have been reported for both albumin and creatinine measurement, but trueness is unknown because there are no reference measurement procedures for albumin and no reference materials for either analyte in urine. The recommended reference intervals for the ACR do not take into account the large intergroup differences in creatinine excretion (e.g., related to differences in age, sex, and ethnicity) nor the continuous increase in risk related to albumin excretion. DISCUSSION: Clinical needs have been identified for standardization of (a) urine collection methods, (b) urine albumin and creatinine measurements based on a complete reference system, (c) reporting of test results, and (d) reference intervals for the ACR.
1
Current ACR reference intervals fail to account for differences in creatinine excretion across age, sex, and ethnicity and do not reflect continuously increasing risk with albumin excretion.
2
Standardization is needed for urine collection, analytical measurement systems, reporting practices, and ACR reference intervals.
3
Substantial intermethod differences exist in urinary albumin and creatinine measurements, while trueness cannot be established because reference procedures and materials are unavailable.
4
The albumin/creatinine ratio is recommended as a surrogate for timed urine collection, but results are influenced by nonstandardized patient preparation and collection time.
5
Urinary albumin excretion is an indicator of kidney damage and a risk factor for kidney disease progression and cardiovascular disease.

Urinary albumin excretion and albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) measurements

Preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical measurement and reporting issues, including standardization, trueness, and reference intervals

Publication Details
Publication Date
2008-11-21
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Kristin M. Aakre
W. Greg Miller
David E. Bruns
Glen L. Hortin
Sverre Sandberg
Matthew McQueen
Yoshihisa Itoh
John C. Lieske
David Seccombe
Graham Jones
David M. Bunk
Gary C. Curhan
Andrew S. Narva
on behalf of the National Kidney Disease Education Program-IFCC Working Group on Standardization of Albumin in Urine
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%