Expectations, Performance Evaluation, and Consumers’ Perceptions of Quality
Ожидания, оценка эффективности и восприятие качества потребителями
1993-10-01
SCID: 54.1/tg6fv29c
Discuss with AI
alternative perceived quality modelsexpectations measurement validityperceived service qualityperceptions-minus-expectations (P-E) modelrevised expectation (E*)
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
The author examines conceptual and operational issues associated with the “perceptions-minus-expectations” (P-E) perceived service quality model. The examination indicates that the P-E framework is of questionable validity because of a number of conceptual and definitional problems involving the (1) conceptual definition of expectations, (2) theoretical justification of the expectations component of the P-E framework, and (3) measurement validity of the expectation (E) and revised expectation (E*) measures specified in the published service quality literature. Consequently, alternative perceived quality models that address the problems of the traditional framework are developed and empirically tested.
Key Findings
1
Because of these issues, the traditional P-E framework is inadequate and alternative perceived quality models were developed.
2
The newly developed alternative perceived quality models were empirically tested (implying empirical evaluation of the alternatives).
3
The perceptions-minus-expectations (P-E) perceived service quality model has questionable validity due to multiple conceptual and definitional problems.
4
Three specific problem areas identified are: conceptual definition of expectations, theoretical justification for the expectations component, and measurement validity of expectation (E) and revised expectation (E*) measures.
Research Object
Perceptions-minus-expectations (P-E) perceived service quality model
Research Subject
Conceptual, theoretical, and measurement validity of the P-E model's expectations component and alternatives addressing definition and measurement problems for perceived service quality
Publication Details
Publication Date
1993-10-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest