Artificial intelligence, systemic risks, and sustainability

Искусственный интеллект, системные риски и устойчивое развитие
Karen Levy, David García, Victor Galaz, Miguel Ángel Centeno, Peter W. Callahan, Amar Causevic, Thayer Patterson, Irina Brass, Seth D. Baum, Darryl Farber, Joern Fischer, Timon McPhearson, Daniel Jiménez, B. R. King, Paul Larcey
2021-09-17

algorithmic biasartificial intelligencecascading failuressustainabilitysystemic risks
Automated decision making and predictive analytics through artificial intelligence, in combination with rapid progress in technologies such as sensor technology and robotics are likely to change the way individuals, communities, governments and private actors perceive and respond to climate and ecological change. Methods based on various forms of artificial intelligence are already today being applied in a number of research fields related to climate change and environmental monitoring. Investments into applications of these technologies in agriculture, forestry and the extraction of marine resources also seem to be increasing rapidly. Despite a growing interest in, and deployment of AI-technologies in domains critical for sustainability, few have explored possible systemic risks in depth. This article offers a global overview of the progress of such technologies in sectors with high impact potential for sustainability like farming, forestry and the extraction of marine resources. We also identify possible systemic risks in these domains including a) algorithmic bias and allocative harms; b) unequal access and benefits; c) cascading failures and external disruptions, and d) trade-offs between efficiency and resilience. We explore these emerging risks, identify critical questions, and discuss the limitations of current governance mechanisms in addressing AI sustainability risks in these sectors.
1
AI applications are expanding rapidly in sustainability-critical sectors, particularly agriculture, forestry, and marine-resource extraction.
2
AI, sensor, and robotics advances are increasingly transforming responses to climate and ecological change across societal and governmental domains.
3
Current governance mechanisms have important limitations in addressing systemic sustainability risks arising from AI deployment in these sectors.
4
The article identifies four systemic risk categories: algorithmic bias and allocative harms, unequal access and benefits, cascading failures and external disruptions, and efficiency–resilience trade-offs.
5
The paper provides a global overview of AI progress in high-impact sustainability sectors and frames critical questions for managing emerging risks.

AI technologies applied in sustainability-critical sectors, particularly farming, forestry, and marine-resource extraction

Systemic sustainability risks, governance limitations, and trade-offs associated with deploying AI technologies in these sectors

Publication Details
Publication Date
2021-09-17
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Karen Levy
David García
Victor Galaz
Miguel Ángel Centeno
Peter W. Callahan
Amar Causevic
Thayer Patterson
Irina Brass
Seth D. Baum
Darryl Farber
Joern Fischer
Timon McPhearson
Daniel Jiménez
B. R. King
Paul Larcey
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat →
Make a presentation
100%