Correlation between Peripheric Blood Markers and Surgical Invasiveness during Humeral Shaft Fracture Osteosynthesis in Young and Middle-Aged Patients
Корреляция между маркерами периферической крови и инвазивностью хирургического вмешательства при остеосинтезе переломов диафиза плечевой кости у пациентов молодого и среднего возраста
2024-05-27
SCID: 54.1/tvfg97rv
Discuss with AI
aggregate inflammatory systemic indexhumeral shaft fracturesinflammatory blood-derived markersintramedullary nail fixationneutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
The treatment for humeral shaft fractures (HSFs) is still controversial, consisting of a wide variety of orthopedic osteosynthesis materials that imply different grades of invasiveness. The aim of this study is to investigate the correlation between inflammatory blood-derived markers and the magnitude of the surgical procedure in young and middle-aged patients who sustained these fractures. Observational, retrospective research was conducted between January 2018 and December 2023. It followed patients diagnosed with recent HFSs (AO/OTA 12−A and B) and followed operative treatment. They were split in two groups, depending on the surgical protocol: group A, operated by closed reduction and internal fixation (CRIF) with intramedullary nails (IMNs), and group B, operated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with dynamic compression plates (DCPs). Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the two groups could be observed in injury on the basis of surgery durations, surgical times, pre- and postoperative neutrophil-per-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), postoperative platelet-per-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-per-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), systemic inflammatory index (SII), systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) and aggregate inflammatory systemic index (AISI). The multivariate regression model proposed revealed that NLR > 7.99 (p = 0.007), AISI > 1668.58 (p = 0.008), and the surgical times (p < 0.0001) are strongly correlated to the magnitude of the surgical protocol followed. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, a balanced reliability was determined for both postoperative NLR > 7.99 (sensitivity 75.0% and specificity 75.6) and AISI > 1668.58 (sensitivity 70.6% and specificity 82.2%). Postoperative NLR and AISI as inflammatory markers are highly associated with the magnitude of surgical trauma sustained during humeral shaft fracture osteosynthesis in a younger population.
Key Findings
1
Multivariate regression identified postoperative NLR > 7.99, AISI > 1668.58, and surgical time as strongly associated with surgical protocol magnitude.
2
Postoperative NLR > 7.99 showed 75.0% sensitivity and 75.6% specificity, while AISI > 1668.58 showed 70.6% sensitivity and 82.2% specificity.
3
Postoperative NLR and AISI were highly associated with surgical trauma magnitude in young and middle-aged patients undergoing humeral shaft fracture fixation.
4
Surgical protocol groups differed significantly in surgical duration and several inflammatory markers, including postoperative NLR, PLR, MLR, SII, SIRI, and AISI.
5
The study compared inflammatory blood markers between intramedullary nailing with closed reduction and plating with open reduction for humeral shaft fractures.
Research Object
Young and middle-aged patients undergoing osteosynthesis for recent humeral shaft fractures using either intramedullary nails or dynamic compression plates
Research Subject
Correlation of surgical invasiveness and trauma magnitude with operative duration and inflammatory blood markers, particularly postoperative NLR and AISI
Publication Details
Publication Date
2024-05-27
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
42
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest