A Randomized Controlled Trial of EEG-Based Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Robotic Rehabilitation for Stroke

Рандомизированное контролируемое исследование роботизированной реабилитации после инсульта с использованием интерфейса мозг–компьютер на основе ЭЭГ и моторного воображения
Cuntai Guan, Kok Soon Phua, Kai Keng Ang, Christopher Wee Keong Kuah, Karen Sui Geok Chua, Chuanchu Wang, Zheng Yang Chin, Wilson Low
2014-04-21

EEG-based motor imagery BCIbrain symmetry indexchronic strokerobotic rehabilitationupper-limb hemiparesis
Electroencephalography (EEG)-based motor imagery (MI) brain-computer interface (BCI) technology has the potential to restore motor function by inducing activity-dependent brain plasticity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an EEG-based MI BCI system coupled with MIT-Manus shoulder-elbow robotic feedback (BCI-Manus) for subjects with chronic stroke with upper-limb hemiparesis. In this single-blind, randomized trial, 26 hemiplegic subjects (Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery After Stroke [FMMA] score, 4-40; 16 men; mean age, 51.4 years; mean stroke duration, 297.4 days), prescreened with the ability to use the MI BCI, were randomly allocated to BCI-Manus or Manus therapy, lasting 18 hours over 4 weeks. Efficacy was measured using upper-extremity FMMA scores at weeks 0, 2, 4 and 12. ElEG data from subjects allocated to BCI-Manus were quantified using the revised brain symmetry index (rBSI) and analyzed for correlation with the improvements in FMMA score. Eleven and 15 subjects underwent BCI-Manus and Manus therapy, respectively. One subject in the Manus group dropped out. Mean total FMMA scores at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 12 weeks improved for both groups: 26.3±10.3, 27.4±12.0, 30.8±13.8, and 31.5±13.5 for BCI-Manus and 26.6±18.9, 29.9±20.6, 32.9±21.4, and 33.9±20.2 for Manus, with no intergroup differences (P=.51). More subjects attained further gains in FMMA scores at week 12 from BCI-Manus (7 of 11 [63.6%]) than Manus (5 of 14 [35.7%]). A negative correlation was found between the rBSI and FMMA score improvement (P=.044). BCI-Manus therapy was well tolerated and not associated with adverse events. In conclusion, BCI-Manus therapy is effective and safe for arm rehabilitation after severe poststroke hemiparesis. Motor gains were comparable to those attained with intensive robotic therapy (1,040 repetitions/session) despite reduced arm exercise repetitions using EEG-based MI-triggered robotic feedback (136 repetitions/session). The correlation of rBSI with motor improvements suggests that the rBSI can be used as a prognostic measure for BCI-based stroke rehabilitation.
1
BCI-Manus produced no significant intergroup difference versus Manus therapy in motor recovery (P=.51), indicating comparable efficacy.
2
BCI-Manus was well tolerated without adverse events and achieved comparable motor gains with 136 versus 1,040 repetitions per session for intensive robotic therapy.
3
EEG revised brain symmetry index values negatively correlated with Fugl-Meyer improvement (P=.044), linking greater asymmetry with motor gains.
4
In a randomized trial of 26 chronic stroke survivors, both BCI-Manus and Manus robotic therapy significantly improved upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer scores through 12 weeks.
5
More BCI-Manus participants achieved additional Fugl-Meyer gains at week 12 than Manus participants: 63.6% versus 35.7%.

EEG-based motor imagery BCI–MIT-Manus robotic rehabilitation for chronic stroke subjects with upper-limb hemiparesis

Efficacy, safety, and motor-recovery outcomes of BCI-triggered robotic feedback compared with intensive robotic therapy, including the relationship between brain-symmetry changes and upper-extremity motor gains

Publication Details
Publication Date
2014-04-21
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Cuntai Guan
Kok Soon Phua
Kai Keng Ang
Christopher Wee Keong Kuah
Karen Sui Geok Chua
Chuanchu Wang
Zheng Yang Chin
Wilson Low
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%