A Randomized Controlled Trial of EEG-Based Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Robotic Rehabilitation for Stroke
Рандомизированное контролируемое исследование роботизированной реабилитации после инсульта с использованием интерфейса мозг–компьютер на основе ЭЭГ и моторного воображения
2014-04-21
SCID: 54.1/u2yqjav6
Discuss with AI
EEG-based motor imagery BCIbrain symmetry indexchronic strokerobotic rehabilitationupper-limb hemiparesis
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Electroencephalography (EEG)-based motor imagery (MI) brain-computer interface (BCI) technology has the potential to restore motor function by inducing activity-dependent brain plasticity. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an EEG-based MI BCI system coupled with MIT-Manus shoulder-elbow robotic feedback (BCI-Manus) for subjects with chronic stroke with upper-limb hemiparesis. In this single-blind, randomized trial, 26 hemiplegic subjects (Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery After Stroke [FMMA] score, 4-40; 16 men; mean age, 51.4 years; mean stroke duration, 297.4 days), prescreened with the ability to use the MI BCI, were randomly allocated to BCI-Manus or Manus therapy, lasting 18 hours over 4 weeks. Efficacy was measured using upper-extremity FMMA scores at weeks 0, 2, 4 and 12. ElEG data from subjects allocated to BCI-Manus were quantified using the revised brain symmetry index (rBSI) and analyzed for correlation with the improvements in FMMA score. Eleven and 15 subjects underwent BCI-Manus and Manus therapy, respectively. One subject in the Manus group dropped out. Mean total FMMA scores at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 12 weeks improved for both groups: 26.3±10.3, 27.4±12.0, 30.8±13.8, and 31.5±13.5 for BCI-Manus and 26.6±18.9, 29.9±20.6, 32.9±21.4, and 33.9±20.2 for Manus, with no intergroup differences (P=.51). More subjects attained further gains in FMMA scores at week 12 from BCI-Manus (7 of 11 [63.6%]) than Manus (5 of 14 [35.7%]). A negative correlation was found between the rBSI and FMMA score improvement (P=.044). BCI-Manus therapy was well tolerated and not associated with adverse events. In conclusion, BCI-Manus therapy is effective and safe for arm rehabilitation after severe poststroke hemiparesis. Motor gains were comparable to those attained with intensive robotic therapy (1,040 repetitions/session) despite reduced arm exercise repetitions using EEG-based MI-triggered robotic feedback (136 repetitions/session). The correlation of rBSI with motor improvements suggests that the rBSI can be used as a prognostic measure for BCI-based stroke rehabilitation.
Key Findings
1
BCI-Manus produced no significant intergroup difference versus Manus therapy in motor recovery (P=.51), indicating comparable efficacy.
2
BCI-Manus was well tolerated without adverse events and achieved comparable motor gains with 136 versus 1,040 repetitions per session for intensive robotic therapy.
3
EEG revised brain symmetry index values negatively correlated with Fugl-Meyer improvement (P=.044), linking greater asymmetry with motor gains.
4
In a randomized trial of 26 chronic stroke survivors, both BCI-Manus and Manus robotic therapy significantly improved upper-extremity Fugl-Meyer scores through 12 weeks.
5
More BCI-Manus participants achieved additional Fugl-Meyer gains at week 12 than Manus participants: 63.6% versus 35.7%.
Research Object
EEG-based motor imagery BCI–MIT-Manus robotic rehabilitation for chronic stroke subjects with upper-limb hemiparesis
Research Subject
Efficacy, safety, and motor-recovery outcomes of BCI-triggered robotic feedback compared with intensive robotic therapy, including the relationship between brain-symmetry changes and upper-extremity motor gains
Publication Details
Publication Date
2014-04-21
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest