The Political Economy of International Relations
Политическая экономия международных отношений
1987-12-31
SCID: 54.1/u366erbc
Discuss with AI
American hegemonyBretton Woods institutionseconomic nationalisminternational cooperationinternational political economy
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
After the end of World War II, the United States, by far the dominant economic and military power at that time, joined with the surviving capitalist democracies to create an unprecedented institutional framework. By the 1980s many contended that these institutions--the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (now the World Trade Organization), the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund--were threatened by growing economic nationalism in the United States, as demonstrated by increased trade protection and growing budget deficits. In this book, Robert Gilpin argues that American power had been essential for establishing these institutions, and waning American support threatened the basis of postwar cooperation and the great prosperity of the period. For Gilpin, a great power such as the United States is essential to fostering international cooperation. Exploring the relationship between politics and economics first highlighted by Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and other thinkers of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, Gilpin demonstrated the close ties between politics and economics in international relations, outlining the key role played by the creative use of power in the support of an institutional framework that created a world economy. Gilpin's exposition of the in.uence of politics on the international economy was a model of clarity, making the book the centerpiece of many courses in international political economy. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, when American support for international cooperation is once again in question, Gilpin's warnings about the risks of American unilateralism sound ever clearer.
Key Findings
1
American power was essential to establishing and sustaining the GATT/WTO, World Bank, and IMF institutional framework.
2
International cooperation depends substantially on great-power leadership and the creative use of power to support institutional arrangements.
3
International politics and economics are closely interconnected, with political power shaping the organization and functioning of the world economy.
4
Post–World War II international economic institutions were created through cooperation between the dominant United States and surviving capitalist democracies.
5
Waning U.S. support, reflected in increased protectionism and budget deficits, threatened postwar international cooperation and global prosperity.
Research Object
Post-World War II international institutional framework (GATT/WTO, World Bank, IMF and related cooperative institutions)
Research Subject
the influence of great-power politics, especially American power and unilateralism, on international economic cooperation and institutional stability
Publication Details
Publication Date
1987-12-31
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest