The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself

Антитрестовский парадокс: политика, противоречащая самой себе
W H Collins, Robert H. Bork
1979-04-01

antitrust lawantitrust suitsconsumer welfareliberty-equality tensionsmall business protection
Shows how antitrust suits adversely affect the consumer by encouraging a costly form of protection for inefficient and uncompetitive small businesses. Bork sees antitrust law as a microcosm which reflects the larger movements of our society, such as the tension between liberty and equality.
1
Antitrust law reflects broader societal tensions, particularly the conflict between liberty and equality.
2
Antitrust lawsuits can harm consumers by encouraging costly protection of inefficient and uncompetitive small businesses.
3
Antitrust policy contains an internal conflict: measures intended to promote competition may protect firms that are unable to compete effectively.

antitrust law and antitrust suits

their adverse effects on consumers through protection of inefficient, uncompetitive small businesses, and the underlying tension between liberty and equality

Publication Details
Publication Date
1979-04-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
W H Collins
Robert H. Bork
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%