China’s energy diplomacy towards Central Asia and the implications on its “belt and road initiative”

Энергетическая дипломатия Китая в Центральной Азии и её последствия для инициативы «Пояс и путь»
Janet Xuanli Liao
2019-12-24

Belt and Road InitiativeCentral AsiaChina’s energy diplomacyShanghai Cooperation Organizationpipeline geopolitics
China’s oil investment in Central Asia from the late 1990s was not driven by energy needs or geopolitical ambitions, like many assumed. The real concern was the safety of its western boundary, while energy was used as an instrument to forge political ties with its neighbours. However, China has become one of the key geopolitical players in Central Asia after more than 20 years engagement, and many observers are keen to find out why has Beijing failed to escape the grand games while focusing on energy diplomacy? And, what is the implications of China’s new status in Central Asia on its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)? This article attempts to answer the questions via reviewing China’s energy diplomacy towards Central Asia, from the lens of geopolitics. Focusing on China’s dealing with Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan, as well as the Russian factor, the research has revealed the main reasons that led China into the grand games: the entangling of politics and China’s energy engagements; the establishment of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization; and the changes of the pipeline map. China’s geopolitical gains have mainly made at the cost of Russia, though the latter chose to accept Beijing’s greater presence in Central Asia against the changed circumstances. The launch of the BRI scheme has amplified China’s geopolitical significance in Central Asia, but also triggered various criticisms, including the debt traps and governance-related issues. China’s dealing with the Muslims in Xinjiang was also a point of disagreement. Beijing may need to revisit its pragmatic featured diplomacy, and to take a more liberal approach to accommodate different political perspectives. With greater power potential, Beijing should bear more responsibilities to ensure peace and stability in Central Asia, together with other powers, not only for the sake of BRI’s success, but also for the interest of the mankind.
1
China became a major geopolitical player because energy engagements became intertwined with regional politics, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization was established, and pipeline routes changed.
2
China’s geopolitical gains in Central Asia occurred largely at Russia’s expense, although Russia accepted Beijing’s expanded presence under changing regional circumstances.
3
China’s initial oil investments in Central Asia primarily aimed to secure its western boundary, using energy cooperation to build political ties rather than meet energy needs or pursue geopolitical ambitions.
4
The Belt and Road Initiative increased China’s geopolitical significance in Central Asia but generated criticism over debt traps, governance issues, and Beijing’s policies toward Muslims in Xinjiang.
5
The article argues that China should adopt a more liberal and responsible diplomacy to accommodate diverse political perspectives and support regional peace and stability.

China’s energy diplomacy toward Central Asia, including its dealings with Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan and its relations with Russia

The geopolitical drivers, evolution, consequences, and implications for the Belt and Road Initiative of China’s energy engagement in Central Asia

Publication Details
Publication Date
2019-12-24
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Janet Xuanli Liao
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%