Distinguished Lecture on Economics in Government—Exchange Rate Regimes: Is the Bipolar View Correct?

Именная лекция по экономике в правительстве — режимы обменного курса: верна ли биполярная концепция?
Stanley Fischer
2001-05-01

bipolar viewexchange rate regimesflexible exchange ratesinternational capital flowssoft pegs
The bipolar or two-corner solution view of exchange rates is that intermediate policy regimes between hard pegs and floating are not sustainable. This paper argues that the proponents of the bipolar view have probably exaggerated their point. The right statement is that for countries open to international capital flows, softly pegged exchange rates are crisis-prone and not sustainable over long periods. However, a wide variety of flexible rate arrangements remains possible. Monetary and exchange rate policy in most countries should not and will not be indifferent to exchange rate movements.
1
A wide variety of flexible exchange-rate arrangements remains feasible despite the instability of soft pegs.
2
For countries open to international capital flows, softly pegged exchange-rate regimes are crisis-prone and unlikely to remain sustainable over long periods.
3
Most countries’ monetary and exchange-rate policies should, and in practice will, respond to exchange-rate movements.
4
The paper argues that the bipolar view exaggerates the claim that only hard pegs or freely floating exchange rates are sustainable.

Exchange rate regimes (hard pegs, soft pegs, floating and intermediate/flexible arrangements) in countries open to international capital flows

The sustainability and crisis-proneness of softly pegged regimes versus the viability of flexible exchange rate arrangements, and the role of exchange rate movements in monetary policy

Publication Details
Publication Date
2001-05-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Stanley Fischer
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%