Distinguished Lecture on Economics in Government—Exchange Rate Regimes: Is the Bipolar View Correct?
Именная лекция по экономике в правительстве — режимы обменного курса: верна ли биполярная концепция?
2001-05-01
SCID: 54.1/u5crajr4
Discuss with AI
bipolar viewexchange rate regimesflexible exchange ratesinternational capital flowssoft pegs
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
The bipolar or two-corner solution view of exchange rates is that intermediate policy regimes between hard pegs and floating are not sustainable. This paper argues that the proponents of the bipolar view have probably exaggerated their point. The right statement is that for countries open to international capital flows, softly pegged exchange rates are crisis-prone and not sustainable over long periods. However, a wide variety of flexible rate arrangements remains possible. Monetary and exchange rate policy in most countries should not and will not be indifferent to exchange rate movements.
Key Findings
1
A wide variety of flexible exchange-rate arrangements remains feasible despite the instability of soft pegs.
2
For countries open to international capital flows, softly pegged exchange-rate regimes are crisis-prone and unlikely to remain sustainable over long periods.
3
Most countries’ monetary and exchange-rate policies should, and in practice will, respond to exchange-rate movements.
4
The paper argues that the bipolar view exaggerates the claim that only hard pegs or freely floating exchange rates are sustainable.
Research Object
Exchange rate regimes (hard pegs, soft pegs, floating and intermediate/flexible arrangements) in countries open to international capital flows
Research Subject
The sustainability and crisis-proneness of softly pegged regimes versus the viability of flexible exchange rate arrangements, and the role of exchange rate movements in monetary policy
Publication Details
Publication Date
2001-05-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest