Cell-Free Hemoglobin-Based Blood Substitutes and Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Death
Бесклеточные кровезаменители на основе гемоглобина и риск инфаркта миокарда и смерти
2008-04-28
SCID: 54.1/uah2j65w
Discuss with AI
hemoglobin-based blood substitutesmeta-analysismortality riskmyocardial infarctionrandomized controlled trials
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
CONTEXT: Hemoglobin-based blood substitutes (HBBSs) are infusible oxygen-carrying liquids that have long shelf lives, have no need for refrigeration or cross-matching, and are ideal for treating hemorrhagic shock in remote settings. Some trials of HBBSs during the last decade have reported increased risks without clinical benefit. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of HBBSs in surgical, stroke, and trauma patients. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library searches for articles using hemoglobin and blood substitutes from 1980 through March 25, 2008; reviews of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory committee meeting materials; and Internet searches for company press releases. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials including patients aged 19 years and older receiving HBBSs therapeutically. The database searches yielded 70 trials of which 13 met these criteria; in addition, data from 2 other trials were reported in 2 press releases, and additional data were included in 1 relevant FDA review. DATA EXTRACTION: Data on death and myocardial infarction (MI) as outcome variables. RESULTS: Sixteen trials involving 5 different products and 3711 patients in varied patient populations were identified. A test for heterogeneity of the results of these trials was not significant for either mortality or MI (for both, I2 = 0%, P > or = .60), and data were combined using a fixed-effects model. Overall, there was a statistically significant increase in the risk of death (164 deaths in the HBBS-treated groups and 123 deaths in the control groups; relative risk [RR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.61) and risk of MI (59 MIs in the HBBS-treated groups and 16 MIs in the control groups; RR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.67-4.40) with these HBBSs. Subgroup analysis of these trials indicated the increased risk was not restricted to a particular HBBS or clinical indication. CONCLUSION: Based on the available data, use of HBBSs is associated with a significantly increased risk of death and MI.
Key Findings
1
A systematic review identified 16 randomized trials involving 3,711 patients and five hemoglobin-based blood substitute products.
2
Hemoglobin-based blood substitutes significantly increased mortality compared with controls: 164 versus 123 deaths, relative risk 1.30 (95% CI, 1.05-1.61).
3
Hemoglobin-based blood substitutes significantly increased myocardial infarction risk: 59 versus 16 events, relative risk 2.71 (95% CI, 1.67-4.40).
4
Increased risks were not restricted to a particular blood substitute product or clinical indication, indicating a broad safety concern.
5
Trial results showed no significant heterogeneity for mortality or myocardial infarction outcomes (I² = 0%, P ≥ .60), supporting pooled fixed-effects estimates.
Research Object
Hemoglobin-based blood substitutes (HBBSs) administered to adult surgical, stroke, and trauma patients
Research Subject
The risks of death and myocardial infarction associated with therapeutic HBBS use
Publication Details
Publication Date
2008-04-28
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest