Cell-Free Hemoglobin-Based Blood Substitutes and Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Death

Бесклеточные кровезаменители на основе гемоглобина и риск инфаркта миокарда и смерти
Charles Natanson, Steven J. Kern, Peter Lurie, Steven M. Banks, Sidney M. Wolfe
2008-04-28

hemoglobin-based blood substitutesmeta-analysismortality riskmyocardial infarctionrandomized controlled trials
CONTEXT: Hemoglobin-based blood substitutes (HBBSs) are infusible oxygen-carrying liquids that have long shelf lives, have no need for refrigeration or cross-matching, and are ideal for treating hemorrhagic shock in remote settings. Some trials of HBBSs during the last decade have reported increased risks without clinical benefit. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of HBBSs in surgical, stroke, and trauma patients. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library searches for articles using hemoglobin and blood substitutes from 1980 through March 25, 2008; reviews of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory committee meeting materials; and Internet searches for company press releases. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials including patients aged 19 years and older receiving HBBSs therapeutically. The database searches yielded 70 trials of which 13 met these criteria; in addition, data from 2 other trials were reported in 2 press releases, and additional data were included in 1 relevant FDA review. DATA EXTRACTION: Data on death and myocardial infarction (MI) as outcome variables. RESULTS: Sixteen trials involving 5 different products and 3711 patients in varied patient populations were identified. A test for heterogeneity of the results of these trials was not significant for either mortality or MI (for both, I2 = 0%, P > or = .60), and data were combined using a fixed-effects model. Overall, there was a statistically significant increase in the risk of death (164 deaths in the HBBS-treated groups and 123 deaths in the control groups; relative risk [RR], 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.61) and risk of MI (59 MIs in the HBBS-treated groups and 16 MIs in the control groups; RR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.67-4.40) with these HBBSs. Subgroup analysis of these trials indicated the increased risk was not restricted to a particular HBBS or clinical indication. CONCLUSION: Based on the available data, use of HBBSs is associated with a significantly increased risk of death and MI.
1
A systematic review identified 16 randomized trials involving 3,711 patients and five hemoglobin-based blood substitute products.
2
Hemoglobin-based blood substitutes significantly increased mortality compared with controls: 164 versus 123 deaths, relative risk 1.30 (95% CI, 1.05-1.61).
3
Hemoglobin-based blood substitutes significantly increased myocardial infarction risk: 59 versus 16 events, relative risk 2.71 (95% CI, 1.67-4.40).
4
Increased risks were not restricted to a particular blood substitute product or clinical indication, indicating a broad safety concern.
5
Trial results showed no significant heterogeneity for mortality or myocardial infarction outcomes (I² = 0%, P ≥ .60), supporting pooled fixed-effects estimates.

Hemoglobin-based blood substitutes (HBBSs) administered to adult surgical, stroke, and trauma patients

The risks of death and myocardial infarction associated with therapeutic HBBS use

Publication Details
Publication Date
2008-04-28
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Charles Natanson
Steven J. Kern
Peter Lurie
Steven M. Banks
Sidney M. Wolfe
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%