Reliability and validity of a brief instrument for assessing post‐traumatic stress disorder
Надёжность и валидность краткого инструмента для оценки посттравматического стрессового расстройства
1993-10-01
SCID: 54.1/ur58me39
Discuss with AI
PTSD Symptom Scaleconcurrent validitypsychometric propertiesrape and assault victimstest-retest reliability
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Abstract This study examines the psychometric properties of two versions of the PTSD Sympton Scale (PSS). The scale contains 17 items that diagnose PTSD according to DSM‐III‐R criteria and assess the severity of PTSD symptoms. An interview and self‐report version of the PSS were administered to a sample of 118 recent rape and non‐sexual assault victims. The results indicate that both versions of the PSS have satisfactory internal consistency, high test‐retest reliability, and good concurrent validity. The interview version yielded high interrater agreement when administred separately by two interviewers and excellent convergent validity with the SCID. When used to diagnose PTSD, the self‐report version of the PSS was somewhat more conservative than the interview version.
Key Findings
1
Both PSS versions demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency, high test-retest reliability, and good concurrent validity.
2
For PTSD diagnosis, the self-report PSS was somewhat more conservative than the interview version.
3
The interview PSS demonstrated excellent convergent validity with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID).
4
The interview version showed high interrater agreement when administered independently by two interviewers.
5
The study evaluated interview and self-report versions of the 17-item PTSD Symptom Scale in 118 recent rape and non-sexual assault victims.
Research Object
PTSD Symptom Scale (PSS) in its interview and self-report versions administered to recent rape and non-sexual assault victims
Research Subject
The psychometric properties of the PSS, including internal consistency, test–retest reliability, interrater agreement, concurrent and convergent validity, and diagnostic conservativeness
Publication Details
Publication Date
1993-10-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest