The Russian Bear: Russian Strategic Culture and What it Implies for the West

Русский медведь: российская стратегическая культура и её значение для Запада
Norbert Eitelhuber
2009-01-01

Eurasian securityRussian foreign policyRussian strategic culturegreat power statusnetworked diplomacy
This essay identifies the nature of Russia's strategic culture: it is its propensity to use force to achieve strategic objectives.It argues that Western policymakers have consistently misperceived the reasons for Russian foreign policy behavior, as they fail to take into account the enduring nature of Russia's strategic culture.This article claims that Russia has a strategic culture that is fairly stable, although significant changes occurred after the breakup of the Soviet Union.Most importantly, Russia's imperial ambitions vanished, along with the desire to spread an ideology.The role of military strength as a source of power declined, while the prominence of economic power increased.In the post-Cold War era, Russia has aimed at restoring its status within a great power order, improving the standard of living for its people, and developing (or revising) its national identity.At the same time, the strategic culture that prevails in Moscow makes Russia particularly sensitive to actions taken by the West.The article concludes by examining opportunities for accommodation and constructive engagement with Russia.To attenuate the tensions that currently exist, the West should react assertively but moderately to rhetorical saber rattling and other provocations, and engage in constructive cooperation on both contemporary security threats and economic issues, including pursuing close cooperation to mitigate the effects of the international financial crisis on Russia.In the near term, the West should focus on working with Russia to develop a new concept for long-term security and stability in Eurasia.Future research should thus focus on forward-looking networked diplomacy approaches that may be suited to overcome a Cold War mindset oriented toward bloc confrontation.* Lieutenant Colonel GS Norbert Eitelhuber is currently serving as a Lecturer for Security Policy at the Bundeswehr Command and Staff College.After working as Research Associate for the German Institute for International and Security
1
After the Soviet Union’s collapse, Russia abandoned imperial ambitions and ideological expansion, while economic power gained prominence relative to military strength.
2
Post-Cold War Russia has sought to restore great-power status, improve living standards, and develop or revise its national identity.
3
Russia’s strategic culture is relatively stable and characterized by a persistent propensity to use force to achieve strategic objectives.
4
The article recommends assertive but moderate responses to provocations, constructive security and economic cooperation, and a new long-term Eurasian security concept.
5
Western policymakers have misinterpreted Russian foreign-policy behavior by neglecting the enduring influence of Russia’s strategic culture and its sensitivity to Western actions.

Russia's strategic culture and post-Cold War foreign policy behavior

The propensity to use force, the evolution of power priorities, and the implications of Russia's strategic culture for relations with the West

Publication Details
Publication Date
2009-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Norbert Eitelhuber
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%