Evaluating Accuracy of Ethiopian Building Code's Prediction for flexure of RC Beam Using Neural Networks
Оценка точности прогнозов изгиба армированных бетонных балок по Эфиопскому строительному нормам с использованием нейронных сетей
2025-01-01
SCID: 54.1/utzztbpg
Discuss with AI
Ethiopian building codeartificial neural networkscompressive-force path methodflexural capacityreinforced concrete beam
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Abstract: The Ethiopian building code standard is a theoretically based design process that was created to address restrictions, however it is not fully consistent with fundamental material attributes. The goal of this research was to evaluate the accuracy of Ethiopian building code techniques for the design of simply supported RC beams in order to perform flexural capacity tests. The design prediction of the flexural capacity of a simply supported RC beam of the compulsory Ethiopian standard (CES-2015) was compared to available experimental prediction, compressive-force path method based on assumption, different from code adapted, and artificial neural networks that were calibrated based on the available test result. This research shows that artificial neural network predictions of the flexural capacity of RC beams are very close to the experimental flexural capacity of RC beams. In addition, while the compressive force-path method is closer to the experimental than the code, it is not as effective as ANNs. When compared to other approaches, the CES-2015 method was a poor predictor of the RC beam's flexural capacity. As a result, using the input-based systematic technique and the compressive–force path method as RC structure design methods reduces the incompatibility between the CES-2015 methodologies and fundamental concrete material properties. The findings are expected to aid structural engineers who work on high-rise building analysis and design.
Key Findings
1
Artificial neural networks (ANNs) predicted flexural capacity of simply supported RC beams very close to experimental results.
2
Findings are intended to assist structural engineers in high-rise building analysis and design by improving flexural capacity prediction methods.
3
The CES-2015 method was a poor predictor of RC beam flexural capacity compared to experimental data and alternative methods.
4
The compressive-force path method predicted flexural capacity closer to experimental results than the Ethiopian building code (CES-2015), but not as well as ANNs.
5
Using an input-based systematic technique and the compressive-force path method reduces incompatibility between CES-2015 methodologies and fundamental concrete material properties.
Research Object
Simply supported reinforced concrete (RC) beams evaluated under flexural capacity prediction methods (CES-2015, compressive-force path method, and artificial neural networks)
Research Subject
Accuracy of different prediction methods for flexural capacity of simply supported RC beams, comparing CES-2015 code predictions, compressive-force path method, and calibrated artificial neural networks against experimental results
Publication Details
Publication Date
2025-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
0
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest