Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes

Лираглутид и сердечно-сосудистые исходы при сахарном диабете 2 типа
John B. Buse, Stuart Pocock, Michael A. Nauck, Steven E. Nissen, Neil R Poulter, Johannes F.E. Mann, Bernard Zinman, Kirstine Brown‐Frandsen, Steven P. Marso, William M. Steinberg, Gilbert H. Daniels, Peter Lommer Kristensen, Lasse Steen Ravn, Mette Stockner, Richard M. Bergenstal
2016-06-13

LEADER trialcardiovascular outcomesliraglutidemajor adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)type 2 diabetes
BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular effect of liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue, when added to standard care in patients with type 2 diabetes, remains unknown. METHODS: In this double-blind trial, we randomly assigned patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk to receive liraglutide or placebo. The primary composite outcome in the time-to-event analysis was the first occurrence of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. The primary hypothesis was that liraglutide would be noninferior to placebo with regard to the primary outcome, with a margin of 1.30 for the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval of the hazard ratio. No adjustments for multiplicity were performed for the prespecified exploratory outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 9340 patients underwent randomization. The median follow-up was 3.8 years. The primary outcome occurred in significantly fewer patients in the liraglutide group (608 of 4668 patients [13.0%]) than in the placebo group (694 of 4672 [14.9%]) (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 0.97; P<0.001 for noninferiority; P=0.01 for superiority). Fewer patients died from cardiovascular causes in the liraglutide group (219 patients [4.7%]) than in the placebo group (278 [6.0%]) (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.93; P=0.007). The rate of death from any cause was lower in the liraglutide group (381 patients [8.2%]) than in the placebo group (447 [9.6%]) (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.97; P=0.02). The rates of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure were nonsignificantly lower in the liraglutide group than in the placebo group. The most common adverse events leading to the discontinuation of liraglutide were gastrointestinal events. The incidence of pancreatitis was nonsignificantly lower in the liraglutide group than in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: In the time-to-event analysis, the rate of the first occurrence of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus was lower with liraglutide than with placebo. (Funded by Novo Nordisk and the National Institutes of Health; LEADER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01179048.).
1
All-cause mortality was lower with liraglutide than placebo (8.2% vs. 9.6%; HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.74–0.97; P=0.02).
2
Gastrointestinal adverse events were the most common reason for discontinuation of liraglutide; pancreatitis incidence was nonsignificantly lower with liraglutide than placebo.
3
In a double-blind randomized trial of 9340 high cardiovascular–risk type 2 diabetes patients, liraglutide reduced the primary composite outcome (cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke) versus placebo (13.0% vs. 14.9%; HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.78–0.97).
4
Liraglutide significantly lowered death from cardiovascular causes compared with placebo (4.7% vs. 6.0%; HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.66–0.93; P=0.007).
5
Rates of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure were lower with liraglutide than placebo but differences were not statistically significant.

Patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk enrolled in a randomized double-blind trial of liraglutide versus placebo

Effect of add-on liraglutide versus placebo on major cardiovascular outcomes (first occurrence of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke), all-cause mortality, and related safety events

Publication Details
Publication Date
2016-06-13
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
John B. Buse
Stuart Pocock
Michael A. Nauck
Steven E. Nissen
Neil R Poulter
Johannes F.E. Mann
Bernard Zinman
Kirstine Brown‐Frandsen
Steven P. Marso
William M. Steinberg
Gilbert H. Daniels
Peter Lommer Kristensen
Lasse Steen Ravn
Mette Stockner
Richard M. Bergenstal
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%