Assessing the net climate benefits of improved grazing intensity in global rangelands

Оценка чистых климатических выгод от увеличения интенсивности выпаса на глобальных пастбищах
Steven J. Davis, Chaopeng Hong, Pete Smith, Adam F. A. Pellegrini, Karl‐Heinz Erb, César Terrer, Jishuai Su, Jinfeng Chang, Shuai Ren, Giuseppe Tempio, Johannes Piipponen, Pierre Ploton, Robert S. Powell, David Encarnation, Courtney M. Currier, Samuel Eze, Dominik Wisser, Fengwei Xu
2026-06-11

CO2 sequestrationglobal rangelandsimproved grazing intensitylivestock emissionssupplemental feeding
Improved rangeland grazing could mitigate climate change through carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) sequestration in soils and vegetation. However, altering grazing practices to increase ecosystem carbon storage may also decrease livestock production and/or increase greenhouse gas emissions through the supply chain, such that the net emissions impacts remain unclear. Here, we assess the global net mitigation potential of improving grazing intensity by quantifying potential CO 2 sequestration alongside systems-level impacts of plant productivity changes, livestock emissions, feed requirements, and production constraints. Improving grazing intensity in global rangelands could sequester 2.2 ± 0.43 gigatons of carbon dioxide equivalent (Gt/CO 2 eq) per year in the near term, but maintaining livestock production through supplemental feeding would reduce net mitigation by 2 to 31% (to 1.8 ± 0.45 GT/CO 2 eq per year). Our results suggest that neglecting systems-level emissions impacts may substantially overestimate the global climate benefits of improved grazing.
1
Improving grazing intensity in global rangelands could sequester 2.2 ± 0.43 Gt CO2-eq per year in the near term.
2
Maintaining livestock production via supplemental feeding would reduce net mitigation by 2–31%, lowering sequestration to 1.8 ± 0.45 Gt CO2-eq per year.
3
Neglecting systems-level emissions impacts can substantially overestimate the global climate benefits of improved grazing management.
4
Systems-level impacts (plant productivity changes, livestock emissions, feed requirements, production constraints) materially affect net climate benefits of improved grazing.

Improved grazing intensity in global rangelands

Net climate mitigation benefits quantified as CO2 sequestration and systems-level greenhouse gas impacts (including plant productivity changes, livestock emissions, feed requirements, and production constraints) resulting from improved grazing intensity

Publication Details
Publication Date
2026-06-11
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
0
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Steven J. Davis
Chaopeng Hong
Pete Smith
Adam F. A. Pellegrini
Karl‐Heinz Erb
César Terrer
Jishuai Su
Jinfeng Chang
Shuai Ren
Giuseppe Tempio
Johannes Piipponen
Pierre Ploton
Robert S. Powell
David Encarnation
Courtney M. Currier
Samuel Eze
Dominik Wisser
Fengwei Xu
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%