Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Hip Joint Infection Using MRI with Metal Artifact Reduction at 1.5 T

Диагностика перипротезной инфекции тазобедренного сустава с помощью МРТ с уменьшением артефактов от металла при напряжённости магнитного поля 1,5 Тл
Reto Sutter, Christian W. A. Pfirrmann, Julien Galley, Christoph Stern, Lukas Filli, Stefan Rahm
2020-05-12

Compressed sensingIntramuscular edemaMetal artifact reduction MRIPeriprosthetic joint infectionTotal hip arthroplasty
Background MRI with metal artifact reduction has gained importance in assessment of pain with total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, its role in diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has not been well defined. Purpose To evaluate findings of PJI after THA and to determine the diagnostic performance of 1.5-T MRI with metal artifact reduction. Materials and Methods Dedicated compressed sensing–based slice encoding for metal artifact correction 1.5-T MRI examinations (from January 2015 to April 2018) in patients with THA PJI (infection group) and noninfected THA (control group) were retrospectively evaluated by two musculoskeletal radiologists. Fisher exact test was used to compare the groups. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were evaluated for each finding. Interobserver reliability was assessed with κ statistics. Results Forty patients (mean age, 69 years ± 11 [standard deviation]; 26 men) in the infection group and 100 patients (mean age, 67 years ± 11; 42 men) in the control group were evaluated. Periosteal reaction, capsule edema, and intramuscular edema differed between the two groups (P < .001 for each finding). Periosteal reaction was found in 31 of 40 patients with infection and 10 of 100 participants in the control group (sensitivity, 78%; specificity, 90%; accuracy, 86%); capsule edema was found in 33 of 40 (infection group) and five of 100 (control group) (sensitivity, 83%; specificity, 95%; accuracy, 91%); and intramuscular edema was found in 38 of 40 (infection group) and 14 of 100 (control group) (sensitivity, 95%; specificity, 86%; accuracy, 89%). Interobserver agreement was almost perfect, with κ values between 0.88 and 0.92. No difference between the two groups was found regarding the presence of osteolysis (infection group, 23 of 40; control group, 60 of 100), bone marrow edema (39 of 40 vs 87 of 100), effusion (20 of 40 vs 26 of 100), abductor tendon lesion (22 of 40 vs 62 of 100), or bursitis (14 of 40 vs 34 of 100) (P > .05 for each finding). Conclusion The presence of periosteal reaction, capsule edema, and intramuscular edema after total hip arthroplasty at 1.5-T MRI with metal artifact reduction had a high accuracy in evaluation of periprosthetic joint infection. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Zanetti in this issue.
1
Capsule edema demonstrated the highest specificity and accuracy, at 95% and 91%, respectively, with 83% sensitivity.
2
Dedicated compressed sensing–based metal artifact reduction MRI at 1.5 T identified periosteal reaction, capsule edema, and intramuscular edema as findings significantly associated with periprosthetic joint infection after THA.
3
Interobserver agreement for the evaluated MRI findings was almost perfect, with κ values ranging from 0.88 to 0.92; osteolysis, bone marrow edema, effusion, abductor tendon lesions, and bursitis did not significantly distinguish infected from noninfected hips.
4
Intramuscular edema was the most sensitive MRI finding for infection, present in 95% of infected hips, with 86% specificity and 89% accuracy.
5
Periosteal reaction showed 78% sensitivity, 90% specificity, and 86% accuracy for detecting periprosthetic joint infection.

Periprosthetic hip joint in patients with total hip arthroplasty undergoing 1.5-T MRI with metal artifact reduction

MRI findings and diagnostic performance of 1.5-T metal artifact reduction MRI for detecting periprosthetic joint infection

Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-05-12
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Reto Sutter
Christian W. A. Pfirrmann
Julien Galley
Christoph Stern
Lukas Filli
Stefan Rahm
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%