Project Risk in the Context of Construction Schedules—Combined Monte Carlo Simulation and Time at Risk (TaR) Approach: Insights from the Fort Bema Housing Estate Complex

Риски проекта в контексте строительных графиков — комбинированный подход Монте-Карло и Time at Risk (TaR): опыт жилого комплекса Fort Bema
Janusz Sobieraj, Dominik Metelski
2022-01-20

Monte Carlo simulationTime-at-Risk (TaR)construction schedule riskcovariance matrix of phases
In this article, we present our own construction process model consisting of 16 stages and eight phases, which is particularly applicable to large investment projects. In the context of each project phase, we examine how the appropriate way of scheduling construction processes affects the problem of the risk of prolonging individual phases and the whole project, as well as of not meeting deadlines (which is one of the main problems faced by management practitioners in the construction industry). There are many methods for assessing risk in this context, but they tend to be overly complex and rarely used by construction practitioners. On the other hand, the risks associated with potential schedule delays can be considered holistically. One tool that can serve this purpose is the combined Monte Carlo simulation and Time-at-Risk (TaR) approach, which originates from the world of finance. We show how the implementation of the process model (individual phases) and the whole project can be considered in the context of the covariance matrix between all its phases and how changes in the arrangement of these phases can affect the risk of time extension of the whole project. Our study is based on simulation data for a large development project (Fort Bema/Parkowo-Leśne housing estate complex) in Bemowo, a district of Warsaw, carried out between 1999 and 2012. The entire investment project involved the construction of almost 120,000 m2 of floor space.
1
A combined Monte Carlo simulation and Time-at-Risk (TaR) approach from finance can be used to assess schedule delay risks holistically.
2
A construction process model with 16 stages and eight phases is presented and is particularly applicable to large investment projects.
3
Many existing risk assessment methods are overly complex and rarely used by construction practitioners, motivating a more holistic approach.
4
Modeling the covariance matrix between all project phases shows how rearranging phase order alters the risk of overall project time extension.
5
Scheduling methods for each project phase significantly affect the risk of prolonging individual phases and the entire project, and missing deadlines.
6
The approach is demonstrated using simulation data for the Fort Bema housing estate complex (1999–2012), covering nearly 120,000 m2 of floor space.

Construction project schedule of the Fort Bema (Parkowo-Leśne) housing estate complex (process model of 16 stages and eight phases)

Risk of project and phase duration overruns and failure to meet deadlines assessed via a combined Monte Carlo simulation and Time-at-Risk (TaR) approach, including effects of phase arrangement and phase covariance on overall schedule delay risk

Publication Details
Publication Date
2022-01-20
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
48
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Janusz Sobieraj
Dominik Metelski
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%