2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
Рекомендации Американской коллегии ревматологов по лечению ревматоидного артрита, 2015 г.
2015-11-06
SCID: 54.1/uzjrkbxs
Discuss with AI
Biologic agentsDisease-modifying antirheumatic drugsGRADE methodologyRheumatoid arthritisTreat-to-target approach
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
OBJECTIVE: To develop a new evidence-based, pharmacologic treatment guideline for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We conducted systematic reviews to synthesize the evidence for the benefits and harms of various treatment options. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to rate the quality of evidence. We employed a group consensus process to grade the strength of recommendations (either strong or conditional). A strong recommendation indicates that clinicians are certain that the benefits of an intervention far outweigh the harms (or vice versa). A conditional recommendation denotes uncertainty over the balance of benefits and harms and/or more significant variability in patient values and preferences. RESULTS: The guideline covers the use of traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), biologic agents, tofacitinib, and glucocorticoids in early (<6 months) and established (≥6 months) RA. In addition, it provides recommendations on using a treat-to-target approach, tapering and discontinuing medications, and the use of biologic agents and DMARDs in patients with hepatitis, congestive heart failure, malignancy, and serious infections. The guideline addresses the use of vaccines in patients starting/receiving DMARDs or biologic agents, screening for tuberculosis in patients starting/receiving biologic agents or tofacitinib, and laboratory monitoring for traditional DMARDs. The guideline includes 74 recommendations: 23% are strong and 77% are conditional. CONCLUSION: This RA guideline should serve as a tool for clinicians and patients (our two target audiences) for pharmacologic treatment decisions in commonly encountered clinical situations. These recommendations are not prescriptive, and the treatment decisions should be made by physicians and patients through a shared decision-making process taking into account patients' values, preferences, and comorbidities. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies.
Key Findings
1
It addresses traditional DMARDs, biologic agents, tofacitinib, and glucocorticoids in both early and established rheumatoid arthritis.
2
Recommendations cover treat-to-target care, medication tapering or discontinuation, comorbidity-specific treatment, vaccination, tuberculosis screening, and laboratory monitoring.
3
The guideline contains 74 recommendations: 23% strong and 77% conditional, reflecting varying certainty regarding benefits, harms, and patient preferences.
4
The guideline develops evidence-based pharmacologic treatment recommendations for rheumatoid arthritis using systematic reviews and GRADE methodology.
5
Treatment decisions are intended to use shared decision-making and incorporate patients’ values, preferences, and comorbidities rather than function as prescriptive rules.
Research Object
Pharmacologic treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, including traditional DMARDs, biologic agents, tofacitinib, and glucocorticoids
Research Subject
Evidence-based treatment recommendations and the benefits, harms, and conditionality of pharmacologic interventions across stages and clinical comorbidities of rheumatoid arthritis
Publication Details
Publication Date
2015-11-06
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest