Towards identification of network applications in encrypted traffic

К идентификации сетевых приложений в зашифрованном трафике
Ivana Burgetová, Ondřej Ryšavý, Petr Matoušek
2025-09-03

Server Name Indication (SNI)TLS-encrypted trafficannotated TLS datasetapplication identificationcandidate application setsclassification with contextmachine learning classifierstraffic fingerprinting
Abstract Network traffic monitoring for security threat detection and network performance management is challenging due to the encryption of most communications. This article addresses the problem of identifying network applications associated with Transport Layer Security (TLS) connections. The evaluation of three primary approaches to classifying TLS-encrypted traffic was carried out: fingerprinting methods, Server Name Indication (SNI)–based identification, and machine learning–based classifiers. Each method has its own strengths and limitations: fingerprinting relies on a regularly updated database of known hashes, SNI is vulnerable to obfuscation or missing information, and AI techniques such as machine learning require sufficient labeled training data. A comparison of these methods highlights the challenges of identifying individual applications, as the TLS properties are significantly shared between applications. Nevertheless, even when identifying a collection of candidate applications, a valuable insight into network monitoring can be gained, and this can be achieved with high accuracy by all the methods considered. To facilitate further research in this area, a novel publicly available dataset of TLS communications has been created, with the communications annotated for popular desktop and mobile applications. Furthermore, the results of three different approaches to refine TLS traffic classification based on a combination of basic classifiers and context are presented. Finally, practical use cases are proposed, and future research directions are identified to further improve application identification methods.
1
A novel publicly available dataset of TLS communications annotated for popular desktop and mobile applications was created to support further research.
2
Despite overlaps, all three methods can identify a collection of candidate applications with high accuracy, providing valuable network monitoring insights.
3
Fingerprinting is effective but depends on a regularly updated database of known hashes.
4
Machine learning classifiers can identify applications given sufficient labeled training data, but require that data to perform well.
5
Practical use cases and future research directions were proposed to further improve application identification methods.
6
SNI-based identification can accurately map TLS connections to applications but is vulnerable to obfuscation or missing SNI information.
7
TLS properties are often shared between applications, making identification of individual applications challenging.
8
Three approaches combining basic classifiers and context were developed to refine TLS traffic classification.
9
Three primary approaches to classifying TLS-encrypted traffic were evaluated: fingerprinting, SNI-based identification, and machine learning classifiers.

Network applications associated with TLS-encrypted traffic

Methods and accuracy of identifying/classifying those network applications from TLS-encrypted traffic, including fingerprinting, SNI-based identification, and machine learning classifiers and their combination with context

Publication Details
Publication Date
2025-09-03
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
1
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Ivana Burgetová
Ondřej Ryšavý
Petr Matoušek
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat →
Make a presentation
100%