Salience and Taxation: Theory and Evidence
Заметность и налогообложение: теория и эмпирические данные
2009-08-01
SCID: 54.1/v2tjh4ng
Discuss with AI
consumer underreactioneconomic incidencefield experimenttax saliencetax-inclusive pricing
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Using two strategies, we show that consumers underreact to taxes that are not salient. First, using a field experiment in a grocery store, we find that posting tax-inclusive price tags reduces demand by 8 percent. Second, increases in taxes included in posted prices reduce alcohol consumption more than increases in taxes applied at the register. We develop a theoretical framework for applied welfare analysis that accommodates salience effects and other optimization failures. The simple formulas we derive imply that the economic incidence of a tax depends on its statutory incidence, and that even policies that induce no change in behavior can create efficiency losses. (JEL C93, D12, H25, H71)
Key Findings
1
Consumers underreact to taxes that are not salient, as demonstrated by two complementary empirical strategies.
2
In a grocery-store field experiment, displaying tax-inclusive price tags reduced demand by 8 percent.
3
Tax increases incorporated into posted prices reduced alcohol consumption more than equivalent tax increases applied at the register.
4
The framework implies that tax incidence depends on both statutory incidence and behavioral salience, and that behaviorally neutral policies can still generate efficiency losses.
5
The proposed welfare framework incorporates salience effects and other optimization failures into applied tax analysis.
Research Object
Consumers' demand and consumption responses to salient versus non-salient taxes
Research Subject
Underreaction to non-salient taxes and the resulting behavioral, incidence, and welfare effects
Publication Details
Publication Date
2009-08-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest