Peripheral Vision Tests in Sports: Training Effects and Reliability of Peripheral Perception Test
Тесты периферического зрения в спорте: эффекты тренировки и надежность теста периферического восприятия
2019-12-09
SCID: 54.1/va86vx46
Discuss with AI
Vienna Test System (VTS)field of vision (FOV)peripheral perception sub-test (PP)peripheral reaction (PR)peripheral vision
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Various studies suggest the importance of peripheral vision (PV) in sports. Computer-based test systems provide objective methods to measure PV. Nevertheless, the reliability and training effects are not clarified in detail. The purpose of this investigation was to present a short narrative non-systematic review on computer-based PV tests and to determine the reliability and the training effects of peripheral perception sub-test (PP) of the Vienna test system (VTS) in a test–retest design. N = 21 male athletes aged between 20 and 30 years (M = 26.15; SD = 3.1) were included. The main outcome parameters were peripheral reaction (PR), PR left (PRL), PR right (PRR), field of vision (FOV), visual angle left (VAL), and visual angle right (VAR). Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman plots. Training effects were determined by students t-test. Good reliability was observed in PR, PRL, and PRR. Moderate reliability was found in FOV, VAL, and VAR. Significant improvements between T0 and T1 were found in PRL with a mean difference of 0.04 s (95% CI [0.00–0.07]) and in PR with a mean difference of 0.02 s (95% CI [0.00–0.05]). For PRR, FOV, VAL, VAR, no significant differences were detected. These results indicate that PP can be applied to asses PV abilities in sports. Future research is needed to clarify the influence of test repetitions on visuomotor learning in PP. Moreover, PV tests should be cross-validated with sport-specific measurements (e.g., on-field and/or ‘virtual reality’ approaches).
Key Findings
1
Computer-based peripheral vision tests provide objective measures of peripheral vision but their reliability and training effects were previously unclear.
2
Field of vision (FOV), visual angle left (VAL), and visual angle right (VAR) demonstrated moderate reliability.
3
Future research should cross-validate PV tests with sport-specific measures such as on-field or virtual reality approaches.
4
In a test-retest study of 21 male athletes, peripheral reaction (PR), PR left (PRL), and PR right (PRR) showed good reliability (ICC).
5
No significant changes were found for PRR, FOV, VAL, and VAR between test and retest.
6
Significant training effects between T0 and T1 were observed for PRL (mean improvement 0.04 s, 95% CI [0.00–0.07]) and PR (mean improvement 0.02 s, 95% CI [0.00–0.05]).
7
The peripheral perception sub-test (PP) of the Vienna Test System can be applied to assess peripheral vision abilities in sports, but repeated testing may involve visuomotor learning effects that require further study.
Research Object
Peripheral perception sub-test (PP) of the Vienna Test System as applied to male athletes
Research Subject
Reliability (test-retest ICC and Bland–Altman) and training effects (pre–post changes in peripheral reaction, field of vision, and visual angle) of peripheral vision measures produced by the PP test
Publication Details
Publication Date
2019-12-09
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest