Evaluation of Geo-Engineering Sweet Spots in Deep Shale Gas Reservoirs of the Northern Luzhou Block
Оценка геоинженерных «сладких зон» в глубоких сланцевых газовых коллекторах северного блока Лучжоу
2026-02-09
SCID: 54.1/vt7c2gnj
Discuss with AI
deep shale gasengineering risk evaluationfault slip riskgeo-engineering dual sweet spotsshale matrix
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
The deep formations (burial depth: 3500–4000 m) in the northern Luzhou Block boast favorable geological conditions for shale gas accumulation. However, field development is hindered by the frequent casing deformation of shale gas wells and significant variations in single-well productivity. These issues severely restrict the efficient development of shale gas resources. Existing studies mainly focus on the identification and optimization of geo-engineering dual sweet spots, but few have established a systematic and comprehensive evaluation system from the perspective of engineering risk prevention and control. Based on traditional research on geo-engineering dual sweet spots, this study integrates engineering risk factors. It innovatively establishes a geo-engineering dual sweet spot evaluation system that incorporates engineering risks. Four key evaluation indicators for shale matrix geo-engineering sweet spots are selected: the continuous thickness of a Class I reservoir, the structural location, the fault scale, and natural fracture characteristics. Accordingly, shale matrix geo-engineering sweet spots are classified into three categories: Class I-A Area, Class I-B Area, and Class II Area. Meanwhile, three key indicators affecting fault slip—the angle between fractures and the maximum horizontal in situ stress direction, fracture dip angle, and friction coefficient—are optimized to establish the fault slip risk evaluation criteria. Combined with the distribution characteristics of slip faults, the engineering risks are divided into three levels: high, medium, and low. Finally, by coupling the geo-engineering sweet spots of a shale matrix with engineering risk zones, the geo-engineering sweet spots of shale reservoirs in the study area are classified into four categories (I, II, III, IV).
Key Findings
1
By coupling geo-engineering sweet spots with engineering risk zones, the study classifies shale reservoir sweet spots in the study area into four categories (I, II, III, IV).
2
Deep formations (3500–4000 m) in northern Luzhou Block have favorable geological conditions for shale gas accumulation but face casing deformation and large single-well productivity variation that hinder development.
3
Four key indicators for shale matrix geo-engineering sweet spots are defined: continuous thickness of Class I reservoir, structural location, fault scale, and natural fracture characteristics, yielding Class I-A, Class I-B, and Class II areas.
4
The study establishes a novel geo-engineering dual sweet spot evaluation system that integrates engineering risk factors with traditional geo-engineering criteria.
5
Three optimized indicators for fault slip risk are proposed—the angle between fractures and maximum horizontal in situ stress, fracture dip angle, and friction coefficient—and used to classify fault slip risk into high, medium, and low levels.
Research Object
Geo-engineering sweet spots of deep shale gas reservoirs in the northern Luzhou Block
Research Subject
Systematic evaluation and classification of geo-engineering sweet spots combined with engineering risk assessment (including reservoir continuity, structural location, fault scale, natural fracture characteristics, and fault-slip risk criteria) to identify favorable zones for shale gas development
Publication Details
Publication Date
2026-02-09
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
1
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest