The effect of post-core and ferrule on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors
Влияние штифтово-культевых конструкций и феррула на сопротивление перелому эндодонтически леченных верхних центральных резцов
2008-01-01
SCID: 54.1/vydjyrx2
Discuss with AI
custom cast post and coreendodontically treated maxillary central incisorsferrule effectfracture resistanceprefabricated titanium post
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
AIM: To evaluate the effect of post reinforcement, post type and ferrule on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary central incisors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty central incisor teeth were selected and grouped into six groups, viz. A, B, C, D, E, and F, each consisting of 10 specimens. Group A specimens were not subjected to any restorative treatment. Group B specimens were endodontically treated and crowned. Specimens of groups C and D were restored with custom cast post and core. Specimens of groups E and F were treated with prefabricated titanium post and composite core. Specimens of groups C and E were restored with porcelain-fused metal (PFM) crown having 2 mm ferrule. Specimens of groups D and F were restored with PFM crown having no ferrule. All the specimens were subjected to load (newton, N) on the lingual surface at a 135 degree angle to the long axis with a universal testing machine until it fractured. The fracture load and mode of fracture of each specimen were noted. One-way analysis of variance with Tukey honestly significant difference procedure was employed to identify the significant difference among the groups at 5% level (P < 0.05). RESULTS: There were significant differences among the six groups studied (P < 0.0001). The highest fracture strength was recorded with specimen of group C (1376.7 N). There were significant differences between groups A and D versus groups B, E, and F. There were no significant differences between groups B, E, and F. Cervical root fracture was the predominant mode of failure in all the groups except group A. CONCLUSION: The results showed that endodontically treated teeth restored with custom cast post core were as strong as the untreated group. Teeth restored with custom cast post core were better resistant to fracture than teeth restored with prefabricated titanium post and composite core. Ferrule is more important in custom cast post core than in prefabricated post and composite core.
Key Findings
1
Cervical root fracture was the predominant failure mode in all restored and treated groups, while group differences in fracture strength were significant (P < 0.0001).
2
Custom cast post-and-core restorations provided greater fracture resistance than prefabricated titanium posts with composite cores.
3
Custom cast post-and-core restorations with a 2 mm ferrule produced the highest fracture resistance, reaching 1376.7 N.
4
Endodontically treated incisors restored with custom cast post-and-core were as fracture-resistant as untreated teeth.
5
Ferrule presence had greater importance for fracture resistance with custom cast post-and-core restorations than with prefabricated post and composite core restorations.
Research Object
endodontically treated maxillary central incisors restored with different post-and-core systems and ferrule designs
Research Subject
fracture resistance and fracture mode as affected by post reinforcement, post type, and ferrule presence
Publication Details
Publication Date
2008-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest