A comprehensive systematic literature review on artificial intelligence for error correction and modulation schemes in next-generation satellite communications

Всесторонний систематический обзор литературы по применению искусственного интеллекта для коррекции ошибок и схем модуляции в спутниковых системах связи следующего поколения
Ekta Sharma, Christopher P. Davey, Ravinesh C. Deo, Brad Carter, Sancho Salcedo‐Sanz
2025-07-21

Low Earth Orbit satellitesPRISMA systematic reviewartificial intelligencecoded modulation schemeserror correction codes
Abstract Communication systems continue to embrace the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in error correction codes (ECC) with coded modulation schemes (CMS). Despite this, there remains a substantial performance gap in AI methods in terrestrial and satellite communication systems. Additionally, AI and power efficiency for Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites have shown a critical gap. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first Systematic literature review attempting to bridge this vital gap to boost efficiency and add fault tolerance. From 389 articles published between 1993 and 2023, the construction and performance of 33 AI algorithms have been comprehensively reviewed for 16 ECC, seven higher-order CMS, and LEO satellites. Based on four key parameters: error correction, modulation, power, and energy efficiency, the PRISMA strategy with a 27-item checklist was adopted and 63 studies were selected to investigate the AI-based performance of terrestrial (40-studies) and LEO satellites (23-studies). Analysing nine performance metrics, Convolutional Neural Network was the most popular choice (20.6%) with an accuracy of 99% and SNR from 6-20dB, followed by Deep Neural Network (19.04%). The least used algorithm was Reinforcement learning (9.52%). Modified Reed Solomon codes showed the best measurement of power consumption and error rate. Adaptive LDPC codes provided a 45% increase in energy efficiency with an 11% computation decrease. Considering appropriate merits and challenges, the review identifies, discusses, and synthesises AI results to create a summary of current evidence for terrestrial and LEO satellites contributing to evidence-based practice for future researchers.
1
Convolutional Neural Networks were the most frequently used algorithm (20.6%), achieving 99% accuracy at signal-to-noise ratios of 6–20 dB; Deep Neural Networks followed at 19.04%.
2
Modified Reed–Solomon codes achieved the best reported measurements for power consumption and error rate, while adaptive LDPC codes increased energy efficiency by 45% and reduced computation by 11%.
3
Reinforcement learning was the least-used algorithm among the reviewed approaches, accounting for 9.52% of studies.
4
The review evaluated 33 AI algorithms across error correction, modulation, power efficiency, and energy efficiency in terrestrial and LEO satellite communications.
5
This systematic review analyzed 389 publications from 1993–2023 and selected 63 studies covering AI for 16 error-correction codes, seven higher-order coded modulation schemes, and LEO satellites.

AI-based error correction codes and coded modulation schemes in terrestrial and Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite communication systems

Their performance in error correction, modulation, power consumption, energy efficiency, accuracy, signal-to-noise ratio, computation, and fault tolerance

Publication Details
Publication Date
2025-07-21
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
6
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Ekta Sharma
Christopher P. Davey
Ravinesh C. Deo
Brad Carter
Sancho Salcedo‐Sanz
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%